A strategic unity: defining the third sector in the UK

被引:69
作者
Alcock, Pete [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sect Res Ctr 3, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
VOLUNTARY SECTOR REVIEW | 2010年 / 1卷 / 01期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
third sector; voluntary sector; community sector; social enterprise; policy discourse;
D O I
10.1332/204080510X496984
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Academics, policy makers and practitioners often stress the need for definition to inform analysis and policy. This paper explores recent debate on the identification of a third sector of organisational activity in the UK. It reviews some leading academic models that have sought to locate this sector alongside others, and then examines attempts to identify the sector as a focus for policy and practice.The importance of policy discourses in shaping debate and constructing definition is explained and the potentially fractured nature of these discourses is explored.These are then contrasted with discourses from practice. A distinction is made between exogenous and endogenous approaches to definition, and the implications of each discussed.The paper identifies a strategic unity within discourse in the UK over the last decade and argues that this has been effective in constituting a unified third sector within policy and practice, albeit one with underlying diversity and potential longer-term instability.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 24
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ACEVO (Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations), 2004, COMM CONTR
[2]  
Alcock P., 2005, CLOSE WORK DOING QUA
[3]  
Alcock P., 2008, SOCIAL POLICY BRITAI
[4]  
Alcock P, 2010, DEVOLUTION PRACTICE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SEARCH CIVIL SOC
[6]  
Beveridge Lord, 1948, VOLUNTARY ACTION
[7]   Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage [J].
Billis, D ;
Glennerster, H .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1998, 27 :79-98
[8]  
Billis D., 2010, HYBRID ORG 3 SECTOR
[9]  
Billis D., 1989, THEORY VOLUNTARY SEC
[10]  
Blunkett D., 2008, MUTUAL ACTION COMMON