A COMPARISON OF SERIAL PLATE AGAR DILUTION, BAUER-KIRBY DISK DIFFUSION, AND THE VITEK AUTOMICROBIC SYSTEM FOR THE DETERMINATION OF SUSCEPTIBILITIES OF KLEBSIELLA SPP, ENTEROBACTER SPP, AND PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA TO 10 ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS

被引:22
作者
FEKETE, T
TUMAH, H
WOODWELL, J
TRUANT, A
SATISHCHANDRAN, V
AXELROD, P
KRETER, B
机构
[1] TEMPLE UNIV,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT MICROBIOL,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19140
[2] TEMPLE UNIV,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19140
[3] BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB US,DIV PHARMACEUT,PHILADELPHIA,PA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0732-8893(94)90028-0
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The use of rapid, automated technologies for assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility and determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations has been evolving for over a decade. We compared the Vitek AutoMicrobic system and Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards methods of serial plate agar dilution for qualitative and quantitative susceptibilities of 301 hospital isolates of Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics tested were aztreonam, cefoperazone, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, piperacillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, and tobramycin. Agar dilution and Bauer-Kirby results were more strongly correlated for all three genera than were the results for agar dilution and Vitek. If agar dilution is presumed to be the ''gold standard,'' Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion had only half the number of false susceptibles as did the Vitek. Thus, the Vitek AutoMicrobic system seems to be somewhat less reliable for both qualitative and quantitative measurement of susceptibility and resistance than is Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 258
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条