RISK OF VERTEBRAL INSUFFICIENCY FRACTURES IN RELATION TO COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PREDICTED BY QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY

被引:26
作者
BIGGEMANN, M
HILWEG, D
SEIDEL, S
HORST, M
BRINCKMANN, P
机构
[1] Radiologische Klinik und Strahleninstitut, Universität Münster
[2] Orthopädische Klinik, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda Duisburg Universität Münster
[3] Institut für Experimentelle Biomechanik, Universität Münster
关键词
QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OSTEOPOROSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; FRACTURE RISK;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(91)90047-Y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Vertebral insufficiency fractures may result from excessive loading of normal and routine loading of osteoporotic spines. Fracture occurs when the mechanical load exceeds the vertebral compressive strength, i.e., the maximum load a vertebra can tolerate. Vertebral compressive strength is determined by trabecular bone density and the size of endplate area. Both parameters can be measured non-invasively by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). In 75 patients compressive strength (i.e., trabecular bone density and endplate area) of the vertebra L3 was determined using QCT. In addition, conventional radiographs of spines were analysed for the prevalence of insufficiency fractures in each case. By relating fracture prevalence to strength, three fracture risk groups were found: a high-risk group with strength values of L3 < 3 kN (kilo Newton) and a fracture risk of 100%, an intermediate group with strength values from 3 to 5 kN and a steeply increasing risk with decreasing strength, and a low-risk group with strength values > 5 kN and a fracture risk near 0%. Biomechanical measurements and model calculations indicate that spinal loads of 3 to 4 kN at L3/4 will be common in everyday activities. These data and the results described above suggest that spines with strength values of L3 < 3 kN are at an extremely high risk of insufficiency fractures in daily life. Advantages of fracture risk assessment by strength determination over risk estimation based on clinically used trabecular bone density measurements are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 10
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Biggemann, Hilweg, Brinckmann, Prediction of the compressive strength of vertebral bodies of the lumbar spine by quantitative computed tomography, Skeletal Radiol, 17, pp. 264-269, (1988)
[2]
Brinckmann, Biggemann, Hilweg, Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae, Spine, 14, pp. 606-610, (1989)
[3]
Brinckmann, Biggemann, Hilweg, Prediction of the compressive strength of human lumbar vertebrae, Clinical Biomechanics, 4, (1989)
[4]
Buchanan, Myers, Greer, Lloyd, Assessment of the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women, J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 69, pp. 212-218, (1987)
[5]
Genant, Ettinger, Cann, Reiser, Osteoporosis: assessment by quantitative computed tomography, Orthop Clin North Am, 16, pp. 557-568, (1985)
[6]
Hansson, Roos, Nachemson, The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae, Spine, 5, pp. 46-55, (1980)
[7]
Hesch, Busch, Prokop, Delling, Rittinghaus, Increase of vertebral density by combination therapy with pulsatile 1–38 hPTH and sequential addition of calcitonin nasal spray in osteoporotic patients, Calcif Tiss Int, 44, pp. 176-180, (1989)
[8]
Hurxthal, Measurement of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae, AJR, 103, pp. 635-644, (1968)
[9]
Kleerekoper, Parfitt, Ellis, Measurement of vertebral fracture rates in osteoporosis, Proceedings of the Copenhagen International Symposium on Osteoporosis, pp. 103-109, (1984)
[10]
Leskinen, Stahlhammer, Kuorinka, Troup, A dynamic analysis of spinal compression with different lifting techniques, Ergonomics, 26, pp. 595-604, (1983)