PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RESTRICTION SITE DATA

被引:27
作者
HOLSINGER, KE [1 ]
JANSEN, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,DEPT BOT,AUSTIN,TX 78712
来源
MOLECULAR EVOLUTION: PRODUCING THE BIOCHEMICAL DATA | 1993年 / 224卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0076-6879(93)24034-R
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This chapter reviews different methods for the phylogenetic analysis of restriction site variation. It illustrates how these methods can be used by applying them to restriction site variation among genera within a subtribe of the sunflower family. Restriction fragment patterns can be characterized either as a simple list of fragment lengths or as mapped restriction sites. When comparing closely related taxa with a low level of sequence divergence, it may be possible to infer restriction site mutations by inspecting fragment profiles. This approach has been used successfully in restriction enzyme studies of chloroplast DNA at the inter- and intraspecific levels, where sequence divergence is in the range of 0.5–1.0%. Restriction fragment differences can be the result either of nucleotide substitutions in the recognition sequences or of length mutations. Restriction site variation has several characteristics that make it particularly appropriate for phylogenetic reconstruction: (1) character states can be scored unambiguously, (2) a large number of characters can be scored in each individual, and (3) it provides information on both the extent and the nature of divergence between two sequences. © 1993, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 455
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ALBERT VA, 1992, MOL SYSTEMATICS PLAN, P369
[2]  
AVISE JC, 1987, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V18, P489, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.002421
[3]   RESTRICTION DATA FROM CHLOROPLAST DNA FOR PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION - IS THERE ONLY ONE ACCURATE WAY OF SCORING [J].
BREMER, B .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1991, 175 (1-2) :39-54
[4]   MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA AND HUMAN-EVOLUTION [J].
CANN, RL ;
STONEKING, M ;
WILSON, AC .
NATURE, 1987, 325 (6099) :31-36
[5]   CHLOROPLAST DNA DIVERSITY IN WILD AND CULTIVATED BARLEY - IMPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC CONSERVATION [J].
CLEGG, MT ;
BROWN, AHD ;
WHITFELD, PR .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1984, 43 (03) :339-&
[6]   CLADISTIC-ANALYSIS OF RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE CLEAVAGE MAPS WITHIN A MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD FRAMEWORK [J].
DEBRY, RW ;
SLADE, NA .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1985, 34 (01) :21-34
[7]  
Dowling TE, 1990, MOL SYSTEMATICS, P250
[8]  
Edwards AWF., 1972, LIKELIHOOD
[9]  
FARRIS J S, 1986, Cladistics, V2, P144, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1986.tb00449.x
[10]  
FARRIS J S, 1985, Cladistics, V1, P67, DOI 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00411.x