A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF NIFEDIPINE AND VERAPAMIL ON EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION

被引:25
作者
HALPERIN, AK
ICENOGLE, MV
KAPSNER, CO
CHICK, TW
ROEHNERT, J
MURATA, GH
机构
[1] Veterans Affairs Medical Center (111), Albuquerque, NM, 87108, 2100 Ridgecrest Drive, SE
[2] The Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine
关键词
NIFEDIPINE; VERAPAMIL; EXERCISE PERFORMANCE; MODERATE HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1093/ajh/6.12.1025
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Twenty-four patients completed a double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of nifedipine GITS (N) and verapamil SR (V) on blood pressure (BP) control and exercise performance. After a 2-week placebo phase, all subjects had measurements of V-O2max, maximal workload, and endurance time. They were then randomized to either N (30 to 90 mg/day) or V (240 to 480 mg/ day) and retested when BPs had stabilized. At rest, N lowered systolic (S) BP by 12 mm Hg (P=.02 compared to baseline) and diastolic (D) BP by II mm Hg (P=.001). V lowered SBP by 8 mm Hg (P =.013) and DBP by II mm Hg (P=.002). Neither drug affected resting heart rate. V significantly decreased resting epinephrine (P=.05) and there was a tendency for V to reduce norepinephrine (P=.07) and dopamine (P=.08). N tended to increase plasma renin activity (P=.07). During graded cycle ergometry N, compared with placebo, significantly lowered DBP at all exercise levels (P=.011), but had no significant effect on heart rate (HR), SBP, or heart rate pressure product (HRPP). Pulse pressure (PP) was significantly increased (P=.045), which was most noticeable at high exercise levels. Compared with placebo, V caused a marked reduction of exercise HR (P<.001), which was more pronounced at high levels, SBP (P=.004), DBP (P=.004), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P=.001), and HRPP (P<.001). V caused a significantly greater reduction in HR (P=.069), SBP (P=.013), MAP (P=.056), PP (P=.023), and HRPP (P<.001) than N. There were no differences in DBP reduction. At maximum exercise, N significantly increased plasma norepinephrine (P=.04). Neither drug affected V-O2max, exercise duration, or maximum workload. In summary, both N and V lowered resting SBP and DBP. During graded cycle ergometry, both drugs effectively lowered DBP, but only V lowered SBP, PP, and HRPP. V is the preferred drug for those who participate in vigorous activity.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1032
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Kaplan N.M., The 1988 report of the Joint National committee on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure, Arch Intern Med, 148, pp. 1023-1038, (1988)
[2]  
Kaplan N.M., Long-term effectiveness of nonpharmacological treatment of hypertension, Hypertension, 18, pp. 153-160, (1991)
[3]  
Reaven P.D., McPhillips J.B., Barrett-Conner E.L., Et al., Leisure time exercise and lipid and lipoprotein levels in an older population, J am Geriatr Soc, 38, pp. 847-854, (1990)
[4]  
Helmrich S.P., Ragland D.R., Leung R.W., Et al., Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus, N Engl J Med, 325, pp. 147-152, (1991)
[5]  
Chick T.W., Halperin A.K., Gacek E.M., The effect of antihypertensive medications on exercise performance: A review, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20, pp. 447-454, (1988)
[6]  
Cohn J.N., Calcium, vascular smooth muscle, and calcium entry blockers in hypertension, Ann Intern Med, 98, pp. 806-809, (1983)
[7]  
Halperin A.K., Cebeddu L.X., The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of verapamil, Am Heart J, 111, pp. 363-382, (1986)
[8]  
Cummings D.M., Amadio P., Nelson L., Fitzgerald J.M., The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of essential verapamil, Arch Intern Med, 151, pp. 250-259, (1991)
[9]  
Spivak C., Ocken S., Frishman W.H., Calcium antagonists: Clinical use in the treatment of systemic hypertension, Drugs, 25, pp. 154-177, (1983)
[10]  
Jueng C., Halperin A.K., Hashimoto F., Callender K., Nifedipine GITS and hydrochlorothiazide in essential verapamil, J Clin Hypertens, 3, pp. 695-703, (1987)