FIGO STAGE, HISTOLOGY, HISTOLOGIC GRADE, AGE AND RACE AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN DETERMINING SURVIVAL FOR CANCERS OF THE FEMALE GYNECOLOGICAL SYSTEM - AN ANALYSIS OF 1973-87 SEER CASES OF CANCERS OF THE ENDOMETRIUM, CERVIX, OVARY, VULVA, AND VAGINA

被引：323

作者：

KOSARY, CL

机构：

[1] Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

来源：

SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 1994年 / 10卷 / 01期

关键词：

COX PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; CANCER; ALL SITES;

D O I：

10.1002/ssu.2980100107

中图分类号：

R73 [肿瘤学];

学科分类号：

100214 ;

摘要：

The prognostic impact of FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race ip survival for cancers of the female gynecological (cervix, endometrium, ovary, vulva, vagina) were examined using cases obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program that were diagnosed between 1973 and 1987. Utilizing Cox proportional hazards modeling and relative survival rates analysis of 17,119 cases of cervical cancer indicated that the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, histological grade, lymph node status, and age at diagnosis were all independently prognostic. No evidence was found of survival differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Younger women were not found to have a poorer prognosis, survival declined with increased age. Analysis of 41,120 cases of endometrial cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, lymph node status, age at diagnostic, and race were all prognostic factors. Clear cell adenocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, and mixed mullerian tumors were all found to have poorer prognosis. Analysis of 21,240 cases of ovarian cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, lymph node status, age at diagnosis, presence of ascites, and race were all prognostically significant. Analysis of 2,575 cases of vulvar cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age, and race were all prognostically significant. Analysis of 916 cases of vaginal cancer indicated that FIGO stage, histologic grade, lymph node status, and age are all prognostically significant. Additional analysis of the data by combinations of independent prognostic factors indicates that the interaction of factors may be more predictive of outcome than any one factor separately. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.*

引用

页码：31 / 46

页数：16

共 97 条

[1]

Cancer Statistics Review: 1973‐1989, (1992)

[2]

(1979)

[3]

(1988)

[4]

Slotman BJ, Nauta JJ, Rao BR, Survival of patients with ovarian cancer: Apart from stage and grade, tumor progester‐one receptor content is a prognostic indicator, Cancer, 66, pp. 740-744, (1990)

[5]

Davis KP, Stanhope CR, Garton GR, Et al., Invasive Vaginal Carcinoma: analysis of early‐stage disease, Gynecol Oncol, 42, pp. 131-136, (1991)

[6]

Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis E, Et al., Assessment of current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of vulvar carcinoma relative to prognostic factor sin survival (a gynecologic oncology group study), Am J Obstet Gynecol, 164, pp. 997-1003, (1991)

[7]

Hopkins MP, Reid GC, Vweerano I, Et al., Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: prognostic factors influencing survival, Gynecol Oncol, 43, pp. 113-117, (1991)

[8]

Kucera H, Vavra N, Radiation management of primary carcinoma of the vagina: clinical and Histopathological variables associated with survival, Gynecol Oncol, 40, pp. 12-16, (1991)

[9]

de Souza PL, Friedlander ML, Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer, Hemotol Oncol Clin North Am, 6, pp. 761-782, (1992)

[10]

Hall KL, Dewar MA, Perchalski J, Screening of gynecologic cancer: vulvar, vaginal, endometrial, and ovarian neoplasm, Can Epidemiol Prev Scr, 19, pp. 607-620, (1992)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →