MEDIA APPROPRIATENESS - USING SOCIAL PRESENCE THEORY TO COMPARE TRADITIONAL AND NEW ORGANIZATIONAL MEDIA

被引:343
作者
RICE, RE
机构
[1] Department of Communication in the School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, State University of New Jersey, Rutgers
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00309.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study assesses a scale measuring appropriateness of media for a variety of organizational communication activities and then compares seven media across six organizational sites. The ranking of media were face-to-face, telephone, meetings, desktop video and videoconferencing, voice mail, text, and electronic mail. Although information exchange and socioemotional relations dimensions emerged, the first provided a parsimonious solution. Multidimensional scaling placed traditional media in separate clusters, and new media together with some instances of text and phone, along interpersonal-mediated and synchronous-asynchronous axes. The appropriateness of face-to-fare and meetings did not change over time, whereas ratings of phone and text (to some extent) and new media did. Appropriateness of new media was weakly associated with use. Finally, there was very little evidence of social information processing influence on appropriateness, except for organizational newcomers' ratings of the newest medium, desktop video.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 484
页数:34
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Bizot E., 1991, ADV IMPLEMENTATION I, P65
  • [2] BURT RS, 1991, STRUCTURE VERSION 4
  • [3] ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS, MEDIA RICHNESS AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN
    DAFT, RL
    LENGEL, RH
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (05) : 554 - 571
  • [4] DAFT RL, 1984, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V6, P191
  • [5] MESSAGE EQUIVOCALITY, MEDIA SELECTION, AND MANAGER PERFORMANCE - IMPLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION-SYSTEMS
    DAFT, RL
    LENGEL, RH
    TREVINO, LK
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 1987, 11 (03) : 355 - 366
  • [6] DOBOS J, 1988, COMMUNICATION RES RE, V5, P28
  • [7] Elliott W.R., 1979, W J SPEECH COMMUNICA, V43, P61, DOI DOI 10.1080/10570317909373954
  • [8] Eveland J. D., 1987, Office: Technology and People, V3, P103, DOI 10.1108/eb022644
  • [9] FISH RS, 1993, COMMUN ACM, V36, P48, DOI 10.1145/151233.151237
  • [10] Fulk J., 1990, ORG COMMUNICATION TE