COMPARING SELF-REPORTED AND PHYSICIAN-REPORTED MEDICAL HISTORY

被引:376
作者
KEHOE, R
WU, SY
LESKE, MC
CHYLACK, LT
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,SCH MED,DEPT PREVENT MED,DIV EPIDEMIOL,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
[2] MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRM,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,CTR CLIN CATARACT RES,BOSTON,MA
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DATA COLLECTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117078
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The authors compared self-reported medical history and medication use in a cataract case-control study of 1,380 persons (1985-1989) in Boston, Massachusetts, with information from the participants' physicians. Under- and overreporting varied by condition and type of medication. A self-reported history of hypertension had the highest sensitivity (91%), and diabetes history had the highest specificity (97%). Among different medications investigated, self-reported antihypertensive medication use was the most sensitive (88%), while self-reported use of insulin was the most specific (99%). Differences between patient- and physician-reported frequencies were very small, except for arthritis (15%) and regular aspirin use (21%). Results suggest an accurate recall of medical and drug usage history in well-defined chronic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 818
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条