COMPARISON OF LASER-DOPPLER PERFUSION IMAGING, LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY, AND THERMOGRAPHIC IMAGING FOR ASSESSMENT OF BLOOD-FLOW IN HUMAN SKIN

In this study we compared three non-invasive methods of measuring skin perfusion, thermographic imaging (TI), laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and the new technique of laser Doppler imaging (LDI). Seven normal volunteers were studied in a temperature-controlled room with an ambient temperature of 22 ± 1°C. Images of the left hand were recorded using LDI followed by TI. LDF was then used on two standard locations on the fingers and back of the hand. The measurements were then repeated for a hot (37°C) and then a cold (10°C) challenge. A significant linear correlation (r = 0.960, p < 0.01, with 95% confidence limit of 0.35-0.77, n = 38) was found between LDF and LDI. However, LDF and LDI did not correlate well with TI (r = 0.577, p < 0.01, with 95% confidence limit of 0.32-0.76, n = 38). The LDI method was found to be highly reproducible (mean ± 1 SD; 625 ± 30, with coefficient of variation 5%). The blood flow and temperature distribution of skin of the hand was then recorded using TI and LDI in 10 patients (mean age ± SD, 41.7 ± 9.9) with scleroderma and eight normal volunteers (mean age ± SD, 30.6 ± 6.5). The overall mean blood flow and temperature in the hands of patients with scieroderma (mean ± SD 444 ± 265 flux, 29.3 ± 3.3°C) was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower compared with the normal volunteers (mean ± SD, 912 ± 390 flux, 34.0 ± 3.2°). These data suggest that LDI is a useful method of assessment of skin blood flow which truly is non-invasive and has the major advantage of studying a much wider area of skin than other available techniques. © 1994 W. B. Saunders Company Ltd.