Meta-relation and ontology closure in Conceptual Structure Theory

被引:4
作者
Nguyen, Philip [1 ]
Kaneiwa, Ken [2 ]
Corbett, Dan [3 ]
Nguyen, Minh-Quang [4 ]
机构
[1] Govt South Australia, Dept Justice, Justice Technol Serv, 30,Wakefield St, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Natl Inst Informat & Commun Technol, Kyoto 6190289, Japan
[3] Schafer Corp, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[4] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Comp Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Ontology formalization; Knowledge representation; Automated reasoning; Conceptual Structure Theory; Order-Sorted Logic; Type theory; Concept type; Relation type; Meta-relation type; Legal reasoning;
D O I
10.1007/s10506-009-9082-z
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents an enhanced ontology formalization, combining previous work in Conceptual Structure Theory and Order-Sorted Logic. Most existing ontology formalisms place greater importance on concept types, but in this paper we focus on relation types, which are in essence predicates on concept types. We formalize the notion of 'predicate of predicates' as meta-relation type and introduce the new hierarchy of meta-relation types as part of the ontology definition. The new notion of closure of a relation or meta-relation type is presented as a means to complete that relation or meta-relation type by transferring extra arguments and properties from other related types. The end result is an expanded ontology, called the closure of the original ontology, on which automated inference could be more easily performed. Our proposal could be viewed as a novel and improved ontology formalization within Conceptual Structure Theory and a contribution to knowledge representation and formal reasoning (e.g., to build a query-answering system for legal knowledge).
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 320
页数:30
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, W3C RECOMMENDATION
[2]   AN ORDER-SORTED LOGIC FOR KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION SYSTEMS [J].
BEIERLE, C ;
HEDTSTUCK, U ;
PLETAT, U ;
SCHMITT, PH ;
SIEKMANN, J .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1992, 55 (2-3) :149-191
[3]  
Breuker J., 2002, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2002: 15th Annual Conference, P73
[4]  
CODD EF, 1970, COMMUN ACM, V13, P377, DOI [10.1145/362384.362685, 10.1145/357980.358007]
[5]  
COHN AG, 1989, ARTIF INTELL REV, V3, P89
[6]  
CORBETT D, 2003, REASONING UNIFICATIO
[7]  
DILLION T, 2008, 5 AS PAC C CONC MOD
[8]   Efficient reasoning [J].
Greiner, R ;
Darken, C ;
Santoso, NI .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2001, 33 (01) :1-30
[9]  
ISO/IEC International Standard, 2007, 247072007E ISOIEC
[10]   Order-sorted logic programming with predicate hierarchy [J].
Kaneiwa, K .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, 158 (02) :155-188