TEICOPLANIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN INTRAVENOUS DRUG-ABUSERS BEING TREATED FOR BACTERIAL-ENDOCARDITIS

被引:48
作者
RYBAK, MJ
LERNER, SA
LEVINE, DP
ALBRECHT, LM
MCNEIL, PL
THOMPSON, GA
KENNY, MT
YUH, L
机构
[1] MERRELL DOW RES INST,CINCINNATI,OH 45215
[2] MERRELL DOW RES INST,INDIANAPOLIS,IN 46268
[3] HARPER GRACE HOSP,DEPT MED,DIV INFECT DIS,DETROIT,MI 48201
[4] WAYNE STATE UNIV,SCH MED,DETROIT,MI 48201
[5] WAYNE STATE UNIV,CTR HLTH,DETROIT,MI 48201
[6] DETROIT RECEIVING HOSP & UNIV HLTH CTR,DEPT PHARM,DETROIT,MI 48201
[7] DETROIT RECEIVING HOSP & UNIV HLTH CTR,DEPT INTERNAL MED,DETROIT,MI 48201
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.35.4.696
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin were determined after multiple 30-min intravenous infusions of 10 to 15 mg/kg every 12 to 24 h in 11 intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) patients being treated for bacterial endocarditis. Multiple serum samples were obtained over 7 to 14 days. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were obtained on days 1 and 5. Serum concentration-time data were analyzed by using multiple-dose pharmacokinetic analysis (NONLIN84). Results were compared with pharmacokinetic parameters derived from previous studies in normal healthy volunteers following multiple intravenous infusions of teicoplanin (3 to 6 mg/kg/day). Total and renal clearances of teicoplanin in IVDA patients were found to be significantly greater and more highly variable than those observed previously in normal healthy volunteers. As a result, predicted steady-state trough concentrations in serum may vary up to fivefold. The mechanism responsible for this variation appears to be related to the glomerular filtration rate. In IVDA patients, individualized teicoplanin dosage may be required in the treatment of bacterial endocarditis.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 700
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   BINDING OF TEICOPLANIN TO HUMAN-SERUM ALBUMIN [J].
ASSANDRI, A ;
BERNAREGGI, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 33 (02) :191-195
[2]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF EFFICACY, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND SAFETY OF TEICOPLANIN FOR SERIOUS GRAM-POSITIVE INFECTIONS [J].
BIBLER, MR ;
FRAME, PT ;
HAGLER, DN ;
BODE, RB ;
STANECK, JL ;
THAMLIKITKUL, V ;
HARRIS, JE ;
HAREGEWOIN, A ;
BULLOCK, WE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (02) :207-212
[3]   STATISTICAL ESTIMATIONS IN PHARMACOKINETICS [J].
BOXENBAU.HG ;
RIEGELMA.S ;
ELASHOFF, RM .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1974, 2 (02) :123-148
[4]   EARLY TERMINATION OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING TEICOPLANIN AND FLUCLOXACILLIN FOR TREATING SEVERE STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS [J].
CALAIN, P ;
KRAUSE, KH ;
VAUDAUX, P ;
AUCKENTHALER, R ;
LEW, D ;
WALDVOGEL, F ;
HIRSCHEL, B .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1987, 155 (02) :187-191
[5]   TEICOPLANIN VERSUS NAFCILLIN AND VANCOMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS CAUSED BY METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE OR METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS [J].
CHAMBERS, HF ;
SANDE, MA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1984, 26 (01) :61-64
[6]   INVITRO INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TEICOPLANIN AND OTHER ANTIBIOTICS AGAINST ENTEROCOCCI AND STAPHYLOCOCCI [J].
DEBBIA, E ;
PESCE, A ;
SCHITO, GC .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1986, 7 :73-77
[7]   A SENSITIVE BIOASSAY FOR TEICOPLANIN IN SERUM IN THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF OTHER ANTIBIOTICS [J].
ERICKSON, RC ;
HILDEBRAND, AR ;
HOFFMAN, PF ;
GIBSON, CB .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1989, 12 (03) :235-241
[8]   COMPARATIVE INVITRO STUDY OF TECHOMYCIN-A2 [J].
FAINSTEIN, V ;
LEBLANC, B ;
BODEY, GP .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1983, 23 (03) :497-499
[9]   INVITRO ACTIVITY OF TEICHOMYCIN AGAINST ISOLATES OF GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA [J].
FIETTA, A ;
BERSANI, C ;
MANGIAROTTI, P ;
GRASSI, GG .
CHEMOTHERAPY, 1983, 29 (04) :275-282
[10]   TEICOPLANIN COMPARED WITH VANCOMYCIN FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS DUE TO METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS [J].
GALETTO, DW ;
BOSCIA, JA ;
KOBASA, WD ;
KAYE, D .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1986, 154 (01) :69-75