COMPARATIVE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF PRIMARY AND METASTATIC CARCINOMAS OF THE LIVER

被引:86
作者
MA, CK [1 ]
ZARBO, RJ [1 ]
FRIERSON, HF [1 ]
LEE, MW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV VIRGINIA, HLTH SCI CTR, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903 USA
关键词
HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; METASTATIC CARCINOMAS; IMMUNOPEROXIDASE STAINS;
D O I
10.1093/ajcp/99.5.551
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Distinguishing primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from metastatic carcinomas to the liver is often difficult, if not impossible, particularly in needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration specimens. In an attempt to identify a specific immunohistochemical profile that would distinguish HCC from metastatic carcinomas, we studied 56 HCCs, 8 cholangiocarcinomas, and 24 metastatic adenocarcinomas with monoclonal antibodies to alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), keratin (AE1, AE3, and CAM5.2), Leu-M1, human milk fat globule (HMFG-2), tumor-associated glycoprotein-72(B72.3), epithelial specific membrane antigen (Ber-EP4), and BCA-225 (CU-18). Both monoclonal and polyclonal (mCEA and pCEA) antibodies to carcinoembryonic antigen also were used. Metastatic adenocarcinomas were often positive for CU-18(71%), Leu-M1 (75%), B72.3 (50%), HMFG-2 (67%), Ber-EP4(83%) and mCEA(71%). Using these antibodies, the frequency of positivity for HCC was 9%, 16%, 11%, 20%, 36%, and 11%, respectively. CU-18 was the only monoclonal antibody in which there was a significant difference in positive rates between HCC and metastatic adenocarcinomas. Most HCCs (71%) revealed a bile canalicular staining pattern with pCEA. Because this staining pattern was absent in metastatic carcinomas, pCEA appears to be useful in confirming a diagnosis of HCC. AE1, AE3 and CAM5.2 antibodies were not useful in distinguishing HCC from metastatic carcinomas. Each cholangiocarcinoma shared a staining profile similar to that of metastatic carcinomas.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 557
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   DISTINCTION BETWEEN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA, CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA, AND METASTATIC CARCINOMA BASED ON IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING FOR CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN AND FOR CYTOKERATIN-19 ON PARAFFIN SECTIONS [J].
BALATON, AJ ;
NEHAMASIBONY, M ;
GOTHEIL, C ;
CALLARD, P ;
BAVIERA, EE .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1988, 156 (04) :305-310
[2]  
BATTIFORA H, 1988, PROG SURG PATHOL, V8, P1
[3]  
BEDROSSIAN CWM, 1989, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V113, P1225
[4]   THE SIGNIFICANCE OF ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN AND OTHER TUMOR-MARKERS IN DIFFERENTIAL IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY OF PRIMARY LIVER-TUMORS [J].
BRUMM, C ;
SCHULZE, C ;
CHARELS, K ;
MOROHOSHI, T ;
KLOPPEL, G .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1989, 14 (05) :503-513
[5]  
BURCHELL J, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P5476
[6]  
CHRISTENSEN WN, 1989, MODERN PATHOL, V2, P8
[7]   THE DISTINCTION OF ADENOCARCINOMA FROM MALIGNANT MESOTHELIOMA IN CELL BLOCKS OF EFFUSIONS - THE ROLE OF ROUTINE MUCIN HISTOCHEMISTRY AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT OF CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN, KERATIN PROTEINS, EPITHELIAL MEMBRANE ANTIGEN, AND MILK-FAT GLOBULE-DERIVED ANTIGEN [J].
CIBAS, ES ;
CORSON, JM ;
PINKUS, GS .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1987, 18 (01) :67-74
[8]  
COOPER D, 1985, LAB INVEST, V52, P243
[9]  
DENK H, 1982, LAB INVEST, V46, P584
[10]  
DILLMAN RO, 1984, CANCER RES, V44, P2213