INFLUENCE OF NEGATIVE ULTRASOUND FINDINGS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF INPATIENTS AND OUTPATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS

被引:38
作者
SLUZEWSKI, M
KOOPMAN, MMW
SCHUUR, KH
VANVROONHOVEN, TJMV
RUIJS, JHJ
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital Utrecht
[2] Internal Medicine, St. Elisabeth Hospital Tilburg, University Hospital Utrecht
[3] Department of Surgery, University Hospital Utrecht
[4] Department of Radiology, University Hospital Nijmegen
关键词
ULTRASOUND STUDY; DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS; VEINS; ULTRASOUND; THROMBOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(91)90023-O
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Real-time ultrasonography (US) was used as a single non-invasive method in the management of 174 patients (56 inpatients and 118 outpatients) with suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Therapeutic decisions were based on the results of ultrasonography alone. If the US examination was abnormal anticoagulant treatment was started. If the initial US examination was normal, no treatment was given and the patient underwent repeated testing and physical examination after 1 day, 7 days and 3 months. In the outpatient group, 1.3% of the ultrasonographic negative patients developed thromboembolic complications (95% confidence limits, 0.03-7.21%). None of the initial ultrasonographic negative patients developed proximal DVT after 1 day and 7 days. In the inpatient group, 10% of the ultrasonographic negative patients developed thromboembolic complications (95% confidence limits, 1.2-31.7%). In 18% of the ultrasonographic negative patients an alternative, unexpected diagnosis was obtained by ultrasound. The most frequent alternative diagnosis was a popliteal cyst. The results indicate that US alone appears to be a safe diagnostic method in the management of outpatients with suspected DVT. In the inpatient group further research is required for definite recommendations regarding a safe ultrasound follow-up schedule.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 177
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Haeger, Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis: I. The interpretation of signs and symptoms, Angiology, 20, pp. 219-223, (1969)
  • [2] Barnes, Wu, Hoak, Fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of venous thrombosis, JAMA, 234, pp. 605-607, (1975)
  • [3] Bettmann, Paulin, Leg phlebography: the incidence, nature and modification of undesirable side effects, Radiology, 122, pp. 101-104, (1977)
  • [4] Cronan, Dorfman, Scola, Schepps, Alexander, Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compression, Radiology, 162, pp. 191-194, (1987)
  • [5] Appelman, De Jong, Lampmann, Deep venous thrombosis of the leg: US findings, Radiology, 163, pp. 743-746, (1987)
  • [6] Vogel, Laing, Jeffrey, Wing, Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: US evaluation, Radiology, 163, pp. 747-751, (1987)
  • [7] Dauzat, Laroche, Charras, Blin, Domingo-Faye, Sainte-Luce, Domergue, Lopez, Janbon, Real-time B-Mode ultrasonography for better specificity in the non-invasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis, Ultrasound Med, 5, pp. 625-631, (1986)
  • [8] Lensing, Prandoni, Brandjes, Huisman, Vigo, Tomasella, Krekt, ten Cate, Huisman, Buller, Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography, N Eng J Med, 320, pp. 342-345, (1989)
  • [9] White, McGahan, Daschbach, Hartling, Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis using duplex ultrasound, Ann Int Med, 111, pp. 297-304, (1989)
  • [10] Philbrick, Becker, Calf deep venous thrombosis a wolf in sheep's clothing?, Archives of Internal Medicine, 148, pp. 2131-2138, (1988)