EVALUATION OF THE HAMILTON-THORN 2030 MOTILITY ANALYZER FOR ROUTINE SEMEN ANALYSIS IN AN INFERTILITY CLINIC

被引:36
作者
NEUWINGER, J
KNUTH, UA
NIESCHLAG, E
机构
[1] UNIV MUNSTER,INST REPROD MED,STEINFURTER STR 107,W-4400 MUNSTER,GERMANY
[2] MAX PLANCK CLIN RES UNIT REPROD MED,MUNSTER,GERMANY
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY | 1990年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
computerized semen analysis; Hamilton‐Thorn; sperm motion analysis; WHO;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2605.1990.tb00967.x
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
In routine semen analysis of 242 patients the values of sperm concentration, sperm motility and progressive sperm motility were measured with the Hamilton‐Thorn semen analyser (HT) and compared to the data obtained by conventional semen analysis according to the guidelines of the WHO. Overall, the HT gave higher values for sperm concentration (mean difference 21.7 ± 46.2 times 106 ml‐1, mean ± SD). Motility values showed a corrlation of 0.67 (slope 0.94, P < 0.001) but were estimated lower by the HT than by conventional analysis (mean difference 7.3 ± 21.7%); this was caused by the overestimation of sperm concentration. In the range from 0 to 50% motility the HT yielded lower values and higher values from 50 to 100% motility. Progressive motility values of the HT agreed better with conventional analysis (WHO categories a+b): the mean difference of all values was 0.5 ± 19.5% (r = 0.74, slope = 1.0). The mean lateral head displacement measured by the HT increased with increasing sperm path velocity, but other significant correlations between sperm movement parameters could not be demonstrated. In many instances round cells and debris could not be distinguished from normal sperm. In conclusion, the HT system cannot replace conventional semen analysis in routine diagnosis. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BEHRE HM, 1989, ARESSERONO S REV S, V1
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
GILL HS, 1988, ANDROLOGIA, V20, P433
[4]  
GINSBURG KA, 1988, J ANDROL, V9, P82
[5]   ERRORS INHERENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF A ROUTINE SEMEN ANALYSIS [J].
JEQUIER, AM ;
UKOMBE, EB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 55 (04) :434-436
[6]  
KNUTH UA, 1988, FERTIL STERIL, V49, P881
[7]  
KNUTH UA, 1987, FERTIL STERIL, V48, P118
[8]  
KNUTH UA, 1989, SERONRO S REV, V20
[9]  
KNUTH UA, 1989, INT J ANDROL, V12, P373
[10]  
MAHONY MC, 1988, FERTIL STERIL, V49, P876