NEONATAL MORPHOMETRY - RELATION TO OBSTETRIC, PEDIATRIC, AND MENSTRUAL ESTIMATES OF GESTATIONAL-AGE

被引:37
作者
DOMBROWSKI, MP [1 ]
WOLFE, HM [1 ]
BRANS, YW [1 ]
SALEH, AAA [1 ]
SOKOL, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] WAYNE STATE UNIV,HUTZEL HOSP,DEPT PEDIAT,DETROIT,MI 48201
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN | 1992年 / 146卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.1992.02160190084027
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective.-To determine gestational age-dependent neonatal morphometrics based on last menstrual periods (LMPs), Ballard examinations, and obstetric estimates of gestational age. Design, Setting, and Participants.-Cross-sectional survey of 38 818 live-born neonates at a tertiary care center in Detroit, Mich. Selection Procedures. -Consecutive sample of all viable, structurally normal, singleton neonates delivered at Hutzel Hospital from 1984 through 1991. Measurements/Main Results.-Neonatal weights, lengths, and head circumferences were recorded at birth. Gestational age-dependent morphometrics were based solely on LMPs and compared with those based on obstetric estimates (using LMPs corrected by fetal ultrasound). Ballard examination had an 85.4% concurrence (within 14 days) with obstetric estimates of gestational age, but only a 69.9% (P<.0001) agreement with LMP. Dating only by LMP significantly overestimated the prevalence of prematurity (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 99% confidence interval [Cl], 1.3 to 1.4) and postmaturity (OR, 5.0; 99% Cl, 4.6 to 5.4), distorting apparent growth patterns, especially for preterm neonates. In contrast to previous studies based solely on LMPs, morphometric measurements increased beyond 40 weeks when dated by obstetric estimates. Conclusions.-Gestational age-dependent neonatal morphometrics should not be based solely on LMPs.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 856
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BABSON SG, 1970, PEDIATRICS, V45, P937
[2]   SIMPLIFIED SCORE FOR ASSESSMENT OF FETAL MATURATION OF NEWLY BORN INFANTS [J].
BALLARD, JL ;
NOVAK, KK ;
DRIVER, M .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1979, 95 (05) :769-774
[3]   STANDARD OF FETAL GROWTH FOR UNITED-STATES-OF-AMERICA [J].
BRENNER, WE ;
EDELMAN, DA ;
HENDRICKS, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1976, 126 (05) :555-564
[4]   POPULATION-BASED INTRAUTERINE GROWTH-CURVES FROM COMPUTERIZED BIRTH CERTIFICATES [J].
DAVID, RJ .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 76 (11) :1401-1406
[5]   THE QUALITY AND COMPLETENESS OF BIRTH-WEIGHT AND GESTATIONAL-AGE DATA IN COMPUTERIZED BIRTH FILES [J].
DAVID, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1980, 70 (09) :964-973
[6]   CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF GESTATIONAL AGE IN NEWBORN INFANT [J].
DUBOWITZ, LM ;
DUBOWITZ, V ;
GOLDBERG, C .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1970, 77 (01) :1-+
[7]  
FREEMAN MG, 1970, PEDIATRICS, V46, P9
[8]  
HADLOCK FP, 1991, J ULTRAS MED, V10, P557
[9]  
HILL LM, 1991, FEMALE PATIENT, V16, P37
[10]   THE VALIDITY OF GESTATIONAL-AGE ESTIMATION BY MENSTRUAL DATING IN TERM, PRETERM, AND POSTTERM GESTATIONS [J].
KRAMER, MS ;
MCLEAN, FH ;
BOYD, ME ;
USHER, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (22) :3306-3308