DECOMPOSITION OF NITROGEN-15-LABELED WHEAT AND CELLULOSE IN SOIL - MODELING TRACER DYNAMICS

被引:22
作者
HADAS, A
FEIGENBAUM, S
SOFER, M
MOLINA, JAE
CLAPP, CE
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA HOSP & CLIN, DEPT SOIL SCI, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
[2] USDA ARS, ST PAUL, MN 55108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700040019x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
The decomposition of heterogeneous plant material could be described more generally if it were based on decomposition rates of defined materials. In this study, mineralization of N-15-labeled wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and N-15 turnover linked with the decomposition of cellulose in soil were measured and compared with simulated kinetics computed by the model NCSOIL. Dried wheat shoots (2 g C kg-1) with a C/N ratio of 14.4, or cellulose with ((NH4)2SO4)-N-15) at the same C rate and C/N ratio, were added to two soils and incubated for 32 wk at 30-degrees-C and 60% water-holding capacity. Inorganic and Kjeldahl N and N-15 were measured and compared with simulated data. Cellulose induced net immobilization of 70 mg N kg-1 within 2 wk; thereafter, net N mineralization was greater than for untreated soils. The decomposition rate constant of cellulose, computed by optimization of the model, was 0.024 d-1. The model underestimated N immobilization, the subsequent rate of net N mineralization, and the isotopic dilution of inorganic N. These discrepancies probably resulted from slower turnover of microbial biomass than simulated. Wheat decomposition was divided into three stages, corresponding to soluble, cellulose-like, and resistant fractions that decomposed with rate constants of 3.0, 0.024, and 4 x 10(-8) d-1 and accounted for 19, 45, and 36%, respectively, of organic wheat N. The computed gross mineralization of wheat N after 32 wk totaled 64% of added organic N, whereas N-15 recovery as inorganic N was 40 to 50%, depending on the soil. The difference was attributed to concurrent assimilation of labeled N by soil microbial biomass that depended partly on native soil N concentrations and should be considered in interpreting tracer experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1001
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   DECOMPOSITION OF PLANT-MATERIAL IN AUSTRALIAN SOILS .2. RESIDUAL ORGANIC C-14 AND N-15 FROM LEGUME PLANT-PARTS DECOMPOSING UNDER FIELD AND LABORATORY CONDITIONS [J].
AMATO, M ;
JACKSON, RB ;
BUTLER, JHA ;
LADD, JN .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1984, 22 (03) :331-341
[2]   OPTIMIZATION OF AN ECOLOGICAL MODEL WITH THE MARQUARDT ALGORITHM [J].
BARAK, P ;
MOLINA, JAE ;
HADAS, A ;
CLAPP, CE .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1990, 51 (3-4) :251-263
[3]  
Bremner J.M, 1996, METHODS SOIL ANAL 3, P1085
[4]   CHLOROFORM FUMIGATION AND THE RELEASE OF SOIL-NITROGEN - A RAPID DIRECT EXTRACTION METHOD TO MEASURE MICROBIAL BIOMASS NITROGEN IN SOIL [J].
BROOKES, PC ;
LANDMAN, A ;
PRUDEN, G ;
JENKINSON, DS .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1985, 17 (06) :837-842
[5]   FATE OF N-15 APPLIED TO SPRING WHEAT GROWN FOR 3 CONSECUTIVE YEARS IN A SEMIARID REGION [J].
FEIGENBAUM, S ;
SELIGMAN, NG ;
BENJAMIN, RW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1984, 48 (04) :838-843
[6]   METHOD OF SAMPLE PREPARATION FOR N-15 DETERMINATION IN SOIL EXTRACTS BY EMISSION SPECTROMETRY [J].
FEIGENBAUM, S ;
HADAS, A .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1974, 117 (03) :168-170
[7]   ESTIMATING NET NITROGEN MINERALIZATION FROM CARBON-DIOXIDE EVOLUTION [J].
GILMOUR, JT ;
CLARK, MD ;
SIGUA, GC .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (06) :1398-1402
[8]   FACTORS AFFECTING NITROGEN IMMOBILIZATION IN SOIL AS ESTIMATED BY SIMULATION-MODELS [J].
HADAS, A ;
MOLINA, JAE ;
FEIGENBAUM, S ;
CLAPP, CE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (05) :1481-1486
[9]   ANALYSIS OF SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS NITROGEN AND N-15 WITH A HIGH BACKGROUND OF LABELED MINERAL-N [J].
HADAS, A ;
SOFER, M ;
FEIGENBAUM, S ;
MOLINA, JAE ;
CLAPP, CE .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1989, 20 (9-10) :923-933
[10]   ASSIMILATION OF NITROGEN BY SOIL MICROBIAL-POPULATION - NH4 VERSUS ORGANIC-N [J].
HADAS, A ;
SOFER, M ;
MOLINA, JAE ;
BARAK, P ;
CLAPP, CE .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 24 (02) :137-143