The Impact of Race and Ethnicity on the Identification Process for Giftedness in Utah

被引:19
作者
Warne, Russell T. [1 ]
Anderson, Braydon [2 ]
Johnson, Alyce O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah Valley Univ, Dept Behav Sci, 800 W Univ Pkwy MC 115, Orem, UT 84058 USA
[2] Utah Valley Univ, Behav Sci, Orem, UT USA
关键词
gifted identification; racial and ethnic groups; multiple regression; multicultural education; Utah;
D O I
10.1177/0162353213506065
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Many gifted education experts have found that Black, Hispanic, and Native American students are less likely to be identified for gifted programs than Asian American and White students. A study was conducted to ascertain the degree of underrepresentation of these groups in gifted programs in Utah. Using state-collected data from 14,781 students in six representative school districts in Utah, it was found through multiple logistic regression analysis that there was no statistically significant difference in the likelihoods that Black, Hispanic, or Native American students and White students would be identified as gifted; Asian American and Pacific Islander students were more likely to be identified as gifted than White students. After controlling for academic achievement and SES, it was found that all diverse demographic groups of students were more likely to be identified as gifted than White students, although the differences did not reach statistical significance for multiracial or Native American students. Further research into the nature and causes of disproportionate representation in gifted programs is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 508
页数:22
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Agresti A., An introduction to categorical data analysis, (2007)
[2]  
Standards for educational and psychological testing., (1999)
[3]  
Camara W.J., College admission testing: Myths and realities in an age of admissions hype, Correcting fallacies about educational and psychological testing, pp. 147-180, (2009)
[4]  
Camilli G., Test fairness, Educational Measurement, pp. 221-256, (2006)
[5]  
Carman C.A., Taylor D.K., Socioeconomic status effects on using the naglieri nonverbal ability test (nnat) to identify the gifted/talented, Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, pp. 75-84, (2010)
[6]  
Carpenter D.M., Ramirez A., More than one gap: Dropout rate gaps between and among black, hispanic, and white students, Journal of Advanced Academics, 19, pp. 32-64, (2007)
[7]  
Crocker L., Algina J., Introduction to classical and modern test theory., (2008)
[8]  
Dai D.Y., The nature and nurture of giftedness.
[9]  
Dai D.Y., Swanson J.A., Cheng H., State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998 2010, Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, pp. 126-138, (2011)
[10]  
Embretson S.E., Reise S.P., Item response theory for psychologists., (2000)