EVOLUTION OF OVIDUCTAL GESTATION IN AMPHIBIANS

被引:71
作者
WAKE, MH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,MUSEUM VERTEBRATE ZOOL,BERKELEY,CA 94720
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY | 1993年 / 266卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jez.1402660507
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Oviductal retention of developing embryos, with provision for maternal nutrition after yolk is exhausted (viviparity) and maintenance through metamorphosis, has evolved independently in each of the three living orders of amphibians, the Anura (frogs and toads), the Urodela (salamanders and newts), and the Gymnophiona (caecilians). In anurans and urodeles obligate viviparity is very rare (less than 1% of species); a few additional species retain the developing young, but nutrition is yolk-dependent (ovoviviparity) and, at least in salamanders, the young may be born before metamorphosis is complete. However, in caecilians probably the majority of the approximately 170 species are viviparous, and none are ovoviviparous. All of the amphibians that retain their young oviductally practice internal fertilization; the mechanism is cloacal apposition in frogs, spermatophore reception in salamanders, and intromission in caecilians. Internal fertilization is a necessary but not sufficient exaptation (sensu Gould and Vrba: Paleobiology 8:4-15, '82) for viviparity. The salamanders and all but one of the frogs that are oviductal developers live at high altitudes and are subject to rigorous climatic variables; hence, it has been suggested that cold might be a ''selection pressure'' for the evolution of egg retention. However, one frog and all the live-bearing caecilians are tropical low to middle elevation inhabitants, so factors other than cold are implicated in the evolution of live-bearing. Viviparity might facilitate life in a rigorous environment, but likely is not ''caused'' by such an existence. (C) 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 413
页数:20
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
AMOOSO EC, 1952, MARSHALLS PHYSL REPR, P127
[2]   EVOLUTION OF VIVIPARITY [J].
AMOROSO, EC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1968, 61 (11P2) :1188-&
[3]  
Angel F., 1944, Annales des Sciences Naturelles Paris Zoologie (11), V6, P63
[4]  
Angel F., 1948, Annales des Sciences Naturelles Paris, V10, P115
[5]  
Angel F., 1943, BULL NATION MUS HIST NAT [PARIS], V15, P167
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, BIOMETRIKA
[7]  
ARRIO A, 1969, PHYSIS, V28, P449
[8]  
BILLO R R, 1985, Amphibia-Reptilia, V6, P1, DOI 10.1163/156853885X00137
[9]   EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CORPUS-LUTEUM [J].
BROWNING, HC .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1973, 8 (02) :128-157
[10]  
BUSSE K, 1970, COPEIA, P395