INFUSION OF PROPOFOL TO IDENTIFY SMALLEST EFFECTIVE DOSES FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN YOUNG AND ELDERLY PATIENTS

被引:46
作者
PEACOCK, JE
SPIERS, SPW
MCLAUCHLAN, GA
EDMONDSON, WC
BERTHOUD, M
REILLY, CS
机构
[1] University Department of Anaesthesia, Sheffield University Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, Beech Hill Road
关键词
ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS; PROPOFOL; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1093/bja/69.4.363
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We studied 110 patients older than 60 yr or aged 18-50 yr as separate groups in two stages to identify the smallest effective doses of propofol for induction of anaesthesia. In the elderly patients, in stage 1, at infusion rates of 25, 50 or 100 mg min-1 the mean (SD) doses administered were propofol 0.82 (0.14) mg kg-1, 1.22 (0.24) mg kg-1 and 1.65 (0.60) mg kg-1 and the induction times 140.1 (21.9) s, 103.2 (23.5) s and 69.4 (10.0) s, respectively. In stage 2, after induction with a fixed dose of 0.82 mg kg-1 as a bolus over 5 s or as an infusion at 25 mg min-1, the times for induction were 38.5 (14.0) s and 144.5 (36.6) s, respectively. In the young patients, at induction rates of 33.3, 50, 100 or 200 mg min-1, the doses administered were propofol 1.36 (0.28) mg kg-1, 1.46 (0.12) mg kg-1, 1.85 (0.43) mg kg-1 and 2.39 (0.50) mg kg-1 and the induction times 145.0 (25.4) s, 120.0 (18.4) s, 80.2 (19.2) s and 54.5 (10.4) s, respectively. In stage 2, a fixed induction dose of 1.46 mg kg-1 resulted in induction times of 35.0 (8.5) s and 134.0 (26.8) s, respectively. In stage 2 of each age group, induction was achieved with smaller doses than those recommended previously and there was no difference in the number of patients in whom induction of anaesthesia was successful or in the measured cardiorespiratory variables between the two induction regimens. This suggests the latter effects are caused by the dose administered and not the rate of administration.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 367
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   EFFECTIVENESS OF PREOXYGENATION IN MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS [J].
BERTHOUD, MC ;
PEACOCK, JE ;
REILLY, CS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (04) :464-466
[2]   SENSITIVITY TO PROPOFOL IN THE ELDERLY [J].
DUNDEE, JW ;
ROBINSON, FP ;
MCCOLLUM, JSC ;
PATTERSON, CC .
ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 41 (05) :482-485
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON INDUCTION WITH PROPOFOL - A COMPARISON WITH ETOMIDATE [J].
GILLIES, GWA ;
LEES, NW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (05) :386-388
[4]   PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS [J].
HULL, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1979, 51 (07) :579-594
[5]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL (DIPRIVAN) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS [J].
KIRKPATRICK, T ;
COCKSHOTT, ID ;
DOUGLAS, EJ ;
NIMMO, WS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (02) :146-150
[6]  
Larsen R, 1988, Anaesthesia, V43 Suppl, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09064.x
[7]   EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RATES OF INFUSION OF PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS [J].
PEACOCK, JE ;
LEWIS, RP ;
REILLY, CS ;
NIMMO, WS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 65 (03) :346-352
[8]   EFFECT OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA USING PROPOFOL [J].
ROLLY, G ;
VERSICHELEN, L ;
HUYGHE, L ;
MUNGROOP, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 57 (08) :743-746
[9]   PROPOFOL FOR INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANESTHESIA - COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUNGER AND OLDER PATIENTS [J].
SCHEEPSTRA, GL ;
BOOIJ, LHDJ ;
RUTTEN, CLG ;
COENEN, LGJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 62 (01) :54-60
[10]  
STOKES DN, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P578