The complex IrH(SiHPh(2))(mes)(CO)(dppe) (1; mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl; dppe = bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) undergoes competing irreversible mesitylene and reversible diphenylsilane reductive eliminations in benzene, leading to the known Ir complexes Ir(mes)(CO)(dppe) and IrH(SiHPh(2))(2)(CO)(dppe) (2). The kinetics for the C-H vs Si-H competitive reductive eliminations have been studied and indicate that both reactions follow simple first-order kinetics, For mesitylene reductive elimination, Delta H-double dagger = 21.8 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -5.0 +/- 1.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 23.3 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1), while for diphenylsilane reductive elimination, Delta H-double dagger = 15.6 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -25.2 +/- 1.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 23.1 +/- 0.6 kcal mol(-1). A striking similarity exists among the kinetic parameters for diphenylsilane reductive elimination from 1 and for H-2 reductive eliminations from IrH2(C2H5)(CO)(dppe) (5) and IrH2(C(O)C2H5)(CO)(dppe) (6). To determine if a kinetic similarity for silane and H-2 reductive eliminations-exists among Ir-III (dppe) complexes, the kinetic parameters for triethylsilane reductive elimination from IrH2(Si(C2H5)(3))(CO)(dppe) (7) and H-2 reductive elimination from IrH2(SiHPh(2))(CO)(dppe) (8) were determined. For triethylsilane reductive elimination from 7, Delta H-double dagger = 29.2 +/- 0.3 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = 12.8 +/- 0.9 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 25.4 +/- 0.4 kcal mol(-1). For H-2 reductive elimination from 8, Delta H-double dagger = 25.2 +/- 0.7 kcal mol(-1), Delta S-double dagger = -4.2 +/- 2.1 eu, and Delta G(298)(double dagger) = 26.4 +/- 0.9 kcal mol(-1). The negative entropies of activation for Si-H and H-H reductive eliminations are rationalized in terms of sigma-complex formation prior to dissociation.