THE GAP BETWEEN IS AND SHOULD

[1] Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION, P67

[2] HUME ON IS AND OUGHT - A REPLY TO MACINTYRE [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1961, 70 (02) : 231 - 238

[3] CATON CE, 1963, PHILOS Q, V13, P150

[4] ON THE INTERPRETATION OF HUME - DISCUSSION [J]. PHILOSOPHY, 1963, 38 (144) : 178 - 182

[5] HARE RM, 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS, P25

[6] HUME, 1959, PHILOS REV, V68, P451

[7] HUME, TREATISE HUMAN NAT 1, V3

[8] POPPER KR, 1948, ARISTOTELIAN SOC P S, V22, P154

[9] Prior A., 1960, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V83, P199, DOI [10.1080/00048406085200221, DOI 10.1080/00048406085200221]

[10] Shorter JM., 1961, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V39, P286, DOI DOI 10.2307/2273019

[1] Anscombe G. E. M., 1957, INTENTION, P67

[2] HUME ON IS AND OUGHT - A REPLY TO MACINTYRE [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1961, 70 (02) : 231 - 238

[3] CATON CE, 1963, PHILOS Q, V13, P150

[4] ON THE INTERPRETATION OF HUME - DISCUSSION [J]. PHILOSOPHY, 1963, 38 (144) : 178 - 182

[5] HARE RM, 1952, LANGUAGE MORALS, P25

[6] HUME, 1959, PHILOS REV, V68, P451

[7] HUME, TREATISE HUMAN NAT 1, V3

[8] POPPER KR, 1948, ARISTOTELIAN SOC P S, V22, P154

[9] Prior A., 1960, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V83, P199, DOI [10.1080/00048406085200221, DOI 10.1080/00048406085200221]

[10] Shorter JM., 1961, AUSTRALAS J PHILOS, V39, P286, DOI DOI 10.2307/2273019