SHOULD ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS BE USED ROUTINELY IN CLEAN SURGICAL-PROCEDURES - A TENTATIVE YES

被引:46
作者
LEWIS, RT
WEIGAND, FM
MAMAZZA, J
LLOYDSMITH, W
TATARYN, D
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Montreal, Quebec
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80044-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) after clean surgical procedure has traditionally been regarded as too low for routine antibiotic prophylaxis. But we now Know that host factors may increase the risk of SSI to as high as 20%. We assessed the value of prophylactic cefotaxime in patients stratified for risk of SSI in a randomized double-blind trial Methods. Patients admitted for clean elective operations were enrolled, stratified for risk by National Nosocomial Infection Survey criteria, and randomized to receive intravenous cefotaxime 2 gm or placebo on call for operation. They were followed for 4 to 6 weeks for SSI diagnosed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Results. Analysis of 775 patients showed that the 378 evaluable patients who received cefotaxime had 70% fewer SSIs than those who did not-Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (MH-RR) 0.31; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.11 to 0.83. Benefit was clear in the 616 low risk patients-0.97% versus 3.9% SSI (MK-RR 0.25, CI 0.07 to 0.87, p = 0.018), but only a trend was seen in 136 high risk patients-2.8% versus 6.1% SSI (MH-RR 0.48, CI 0.09 to 2.5). Conclusions. The results indicate clear benefit for routine antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgical procedures. High risk patients need more study.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 747
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ABRAMOWICZ M, 1992, MED LETT, V34, P5
[2]   SURGICAL WOUND INFECTIONS DOCUMENTED AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGE [J].
BROWN, RB ;
BRADLEY, S ;
OPITZ, E ;
CIPRIANI, D ;
PIECZARKA, R ;
SANDS, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1987, 15 (02) :54-58
[3]  
CONDON RE, 1991, CURR PROB SURG, V28, P803
[4]   SURGICAL WOUND-INFECTION RATES BY WOUND CLASS, OPERATIVE PROCEDURE, AND PATIENT RISK INDEX [J].
CULVER, DH ;
HORAN, TC ;
GAYNES, RP ;
MARTONE, WJ ;
JARVIS, WR ;
EMORI, TG ;
BANERJEE, SN ;
EDWARDS, JR ;
TOLSON, JS ;
HENDERSON, TS ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 :S152-S157
[5]   POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION - COMPUTER ANALYSIS [J].
DAVIDSON, AI ;
CLARK, C ;
SMITH, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1971, 58 (05) :333-&
[6]   RISK-FACTORS FOR POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION [J].
GARIBALDI, RA ;
CUSHING, D ;
LERER, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 :S158-S163
[7]   THE NATIONWIDE NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION-RATE - A NEW NEED FOR VITAL STATISTICS [J].
HALEY, RW ;
CULVER, DH ;
WHITE, JW ;
MORGAN, WM ;
EMORI, TG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 121 (02) :159-167
[8]   IDENTIFYING PATIENTS AT HIGH-RISK OF SURGICAL WOUND-INFECTION - A SIMPLE MULTIVARIATE INDEX OF PATIENT SUSCEPTIBILITY AND WOUND CONTAMINATION [J].
HALEY, RW ;
CULVER, DH ;
MORGAN, WM ;
WHITE, JW ;
EMORI, TG ;
HOOTON, TM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 121 (02) :206-215
[9]  
HOPKINS CC, 1991, REV INFECT DIS, V13, pS869
[10]  
HORAN TC, 1992, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V13, P606