COLONY SITE SELECTION BY 8 SPECIES OF GULLS AND TERNS BREEDING IN THE VALLI-DI-COMACCHIO (ITALY)

被引:15
作者
FASOLA, M
CANOVA, L
机构
[1] Dipartimento di Biologia Animale, Università di Pavia, Pavia, I-27100
来源
BOLLETTINO DI ZOOLOGIA | 1991年 / 58卷 / 03期
关键词
FORAGING; HABITAT SELECTION; ITALY; NEST SITE; LARIDAE; STERNIDAE;
D O I
10.1080/11250009109355763
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Former studies of nesting habitat selection by seabirds have been limited to single species, or two-species assemblages, and have not assessed the influence of interspecific interactions. We studied the nest distribution of eight species of seabirds, breeding in mixed colonies, in order to investigate the influence of any specific preferences for foraging and nesting habitats, of habitat availability, and of social interactions. The distribution of the foraging zones did not influence colony location. The topography of the islets (mainly their size) influenced the distribution of the colonies in only two species (yellow-legged gulls and little terns). Each species significantly preferred certain types of nesting habitats for its nest site, differing in cover and type of vegetation. Yellow-legged gulls and Little terns acted as <<monospecific colonialists>>, slender-billed gulls and black-headed gulls tend to be <<plurispecific colonialists>>, and Mediterranean gulls, sandwich terns, gull-billed terns, and common terns as <<indifferent colonialists>>. If the nest distribution within the habitat types was determined only by the specific habitat preferences, we would have expected the association of two species within the same patches to depend on their habitat overlap; the relationship between habitat overlap and species association were complex, and we suggest that the nest distribution was determined by an interplay of habitat preferences, together with the tendency to prefer or to avoid certain other species of seabirds.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 266
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Blondel J., Biogéographie Evolutive, (1986)
[2]  
Buckley F.G., Buckley P.A., Habitat selection and marine birds, Behavior of Marine Animals, pp. 69-112, (1980)
[3]  
Burger J., Habitat selection in temperate marsh-nesting birds, Habitat Selection in Birds, pp. 253-281, (1985)
[4]  
Burger J., Gochfeld M., Nest Site Selection and Temporal Patterns in Habitat Use of Roseate and Common Terns., 105, pp. 433-438, (1988)
[5]  
Burger J., Gochfeld M., Nest site selection in Least terns, Colonial Waterbir-Ds, 13, pp. 31-40, (1990)
[6]  
Burger J., Lesser F., Selection of colony sites and nest sites by Common Terns, Sterna Birundo in Ocean County, 120, pp. 433-449, (1978)
[7]  
Byers C.R., Steinhorst R.K., Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data, J. Wildl. Manage., 48, pp. 1050-1053, (1984)
[8]  
Cody M.L., Habitat Selection in Birds, (1985)
[9]  
Cramp S., The birds of the Western Palearctic, 4, (1985)
[10]  
Cramp S., Simmons K.E.L., The Birds of the Western Palearctic., 3, (1983)