CHEMICAL REPELLENTS AND PLASTIC NETTING FOR REDUCING BIRD DAMAGE TO SWEET CHERRIES, BLUEBERRIES, AND GRAPES

被引:26
作者
CURTIS, PD [1 ]
MERWIN, IA [1 ]
PRITTS, MP [1 ]
PETERSON, DV [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV,DEPT FRUIT & VEGETABLE SCI,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
PRUNUS-AVIUM; VITIS-VINIFERA X LABRUSCA; VACCINIUM-CORYMBOSUM; METHYL ANTHRANILASTE; METHIOCARB; BIRD-FEEDING DETERRENTS; AVIAN FRUGIVORY;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI.29.10.1151
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
We conducted 3 years of field tests comparing two chemicals [methyl anthranilate (MA, a natural compound used as a flavor additive) and Keyplex-350 (a proprietary micronutrient formulation)] that were reported to repel birds to exclusionary plastic netting and nontreated plots. Cumulative fruit damage from birds was monitored on sweet and tart cherry (Prunus avium L. and P. cerasus L.), blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.), and wine grapes (Vitis vinifera x labrusca). Initial MA formulations caused injury to fruit and foliage. Two modified MA formulations with microencapsulation and photooxidation inhibitors provided significant reductions in bird damage and fruit splitting on sweet cherries in one of four experiments. A taste panel could not detect MA residues on sweet cherries at harvest. Bird damage was slightly reduced in MA-treated grapes, but damage to blueberries was similar in MA and control treatments. Keyplex did not deter birds from feeding on fruit and caused blemishes on and an unpleasant flavor in treated fruit. Many bird species were observed feeding on these fruit crops during successive years at the three experimental sites. Although these two chemicals have the potential to deter bird depredation, our work suggests that neither is consistently effective against all the frugivorous species in the northeastern United States. Chemical name used: 2-Aminobenzoic acid methyl ester [methyl anthranilate (MA)].
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1155
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ASKHAM LR, 1989, P GREAT PLAINS WILDL, V9, P116
[2]  
ASKHAM LR, 1992, 1KTH P VERT PEST C U, V15, P137
[3]  
Avery M.L., 1992, P E WILDL DAMAGE CON, V5, P105
[4]  
BEDOUKIAN PZ, 1967, PERFUMERY FLAVORING, P41
[5]   SUCROSE REPELLENCY TO EUROPEAN STARLINGS - WILL HIGH-SUCROSE CULTIVARS DETER BIRD DAMAGE TO FRUIT [J].
BRUGGER, KE ;
NOL, P ;
PHILLIPS, CI .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1993, 3 (02) :256-261
[6]   SUCROSE AVOIDANCE BY AMERICAN ROBINS (TURDUS-MIGRATORIUS) - IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTROL OF BIRD DAMAGE IN FRUIT CROPS [J].
BRUGGER, KE ;
NELMS, CO .
CROP PROTECTION, 1991, 10 (06) :455-460
[7]   NONLETHAL BIRD REPELLENTS - IN SEARCH OF A GENERAL-MODEL RELATING REPELLENCY AND CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE [J].
CLARK, L ;
SHAH, PS .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 55 (03) :538-545
[8]   INTERACTION BETWEEN SENSORY AND POSTINGESTIONAL REPELLENTS IN STARLINGS - METHYL ANTHRANILATE AND SUCROSE [J].
CLARK, L ;
MASON, JR .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1993, 3 (02) :262-270
[9]  
CRASE FT, 1976, 197 US DEP INT FISH
[10]  
CUMMINGS JL, 1991, WILDLIFE SOC B, V19, P184