FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTS BY DUPLEX DOPPLER AND GRAY-SCALE ULTRASOUND

被引:5
作者
JANSEN, O
ROB, PM
SCHMIDTKE, V
MARIENHOFF, N
RINAST, E
WEISS, HD
机构
[1] Institute of Radiology Medical University of Lübeck, Lübeck
[2] Department of Medicine, Medical University of Lübeck, Lübeck
关键词
ULTRASOUND; DOPPLER STUDY; TECHNIQUE; KIDNEY; TRANSPLANTATION; ULTRASOUND STUDY;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(92)90198-I
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In the early postoperative period after renal transplantation 388 follow-up ultrasound examinations were performed in 77 patients. Over a period of 18 months standardized duplex indices (resistive index, pulsatility index) and gray-scale parameters (parenchyma/sinus index; medulla/cortex index) were sampled. These data were correlated retrospectively with clinical and pathological diagnoses. To delineate the individual course of duplex and gray-scale indices during different transplant diseases we created a new parameter: the MID (maximal index difference) which is a result of the difference between the highest index during the phase of renal dysfunction and the lowest index during the phase of normal renal function. This MID, calculated for duplex indices and for the parenchyma/sinus index, indicated significant differences in the behavior of renal transplants during the four main diseases: interstitial rejection, vascular rejection, acute tubular necrosis and Cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity. Using the MIDs, a table of cut-off values was established, which enables to differentiate retrospectively these four transplant complications with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 81%. In our opinion consequent follow-up examinations with duplex and gray-scale sonography should be performed, enabling sonography to become a helpful diagnostic instrument in the monitoring of renal transplants.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 31
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Rigsby, Burns, Weltin, Chen, Bia, Taylor, Doppler signal quantitation in renal allografts: comparison in normal and rejecting transplants, with pathologic correlations, Radiology, 162, pp. 39-42, (1987)
[2]  
Jasek, Grenier, Douws, Morel, Ferriere, Potaux, Broussin, Detection of vascular complications in kidney transplants by duplex Doppler US, Diagn Interv Radiol, 1, pp. 35-40, (1989)
[3]  
Kaveggia, Perella, Grant, Et al., Duplex Doppler sonography in renal allografts: the significance of reversed flow in diastole, AJR, 155, pp. 295-298, (1990)
[4]  
Reuther, Wanjura, Bauer, Acute renal vein thrombosis in renal allografts: detection with duplex Doppler ultrasound, Radiology, 170, pp. 557-558, (1989)
[5]  
Genkins, Sanfilippo, Caroll, Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity and specifity in establishing pathologic diagnosis, AJR, 152, pp. 535-540, (1989)
[6]  
Kelzc, Pozniak, Pirsch, Et al., Pyramidal appearance and resistive index insensitive and nonspecific indicators of acute renal transplant rejection, American Journal of Roentgenology, 155, pp. 531-535, (1990)
[7]  
Perella, Duerinckx, Tessler, Et al., Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction by duplex Doppler sonography a prospective study and review of the literature, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 15, pp. 544-550, (1990)
[8]  
Warshauer, Taylor, Bia, Marks, Weltin, Rigsby, True, Lorber, Unusual causes of increased vascular impedance in renal transplants: duplex Doppler evaluation, Radiology, 169, pp. 367-370, (1988)
[9]  
Vogel, Maße in der Sonographie und Computertomographie, (1986)
[10]  
Heldermann, The use of monoclonal antibodies in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the renal transplant, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2, 2, pp. 131-133, (1988)