THE BIG-3 OR THE BIG-5 - THE EPQ-R VS THE NEO-PI - A RESEARCH NOTE, REPLICATION AND ELABORATION

被引:46
作者
DRAYCOTT, SG
KLINE, P
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-8869(95)00010-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A study sought to address the issue of personality dimensionality by comparing two influential personality questionnaires which differ in their theoretical underpinnings; the EPQ-R (three-factor model) and the NEO-PI (five-factor model). Both instruments were found to have a good deal of variance in common, the majority of which was identified along the dimensions of extraversion and neuroticism. On factoring, there was little evidence of a five-factor model emerging; clearly there was variance unaccounted for by the three-factor measure, but this failed to form appropriately-sized additional factors. There is evidence for the interpretation of the NEO-PI 'conscientiousness' measure as a facet of Eysenck's 'psychoticism' (P) factor.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 804
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BARRETT P, 1982, J PERSONALITY GROUP, V2, P94
[2]  
BUDD RJ, 1992, MANUAL 15FQ QUESTION
[3]  
Cattell R. B., 1970, HBD 16 PERSONALITY F
[4]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS TO IDENTIFY MAJOR PERSONALITY-FACTORS [J].
COMREY, AL .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1984, 8 (04) :397-408
[5]  
Costa P.T., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA
[6]  
Costa P. T., 1985, NEO PERSONALITY INVE
[7]   PERSONALITY STRUCTURE - EMERGENCE OF THE 5-FACTOR MODEL [J].
DIGMAN, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 41 :417-440
[8]  
Eysenck H. J., 1965, BRIT J EDUC STUD, V14, P140
[9]  
Eysenck H.J., 1967, BIOL BASIS PERSONALI
[10]  
Eysenck H.J., 1985, PERSONALITY INDIVIDU