REGIONAL EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR FOLLOWING PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION - A 15 YEAR REVIEW, 1972-1987

被引:3
作者
MEEHAN, FP
RAFLA, NM
BURKE, G
机构
[1] Celtic International Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Galway
关键词
D O I
10.3109/01443619009151199
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Epidural analgesia was employed in 345 (25.5 per cent) of 1350 patients labouring after a previous caesarean section between 1972-1987. On retrospective analysis of results for 1972-1982, a vaginal delivery success of 88 per cent was associated with an unacceptable 'procedure related' perinatal mortality and incidence of true rupture of the uterus. Stricter management policies were implemented for 1982-1987 with particular attention to the use of a strict regimen for oxytocin administration, continuous cardiotocography and termination of the labour by repeat caesarean section after 6 hours of active labour if vaginal delivery was not imminent. This resulted in an 82 per cent vaginal delivery rate, no perinatal death associated with delivery and elimination of true rupture of the uterus. Oxytocin for induction or acceleration of labour was given to 50 per cent of patients overall and there was a 50 per cent assisted vaginal delivery rate. Comparisons with patients not having epidural analgesia, delivered concurrently, showed it to be safe for mother and fetus in properly conducted labour. No maternal death occurred in these patients but there were two deaths in patients with elective repeat caesarean sections. © 1990 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 316
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Carlsson C., Nybell-Lindahl G., Ingemarsson I., Extradural block in patients who have previously undergone caesarean section, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 52, pp. 827-829, (1980)
[2]  
Demianczuk N.N., Hunter D.J.S., Taylor D.W., Trial of labor after previous cesarean section: prognostic indicators of outcome, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 142, pp. 640-642, (1982)
[3]  
Donnelly J.P., Franzoni K.T., Uterine rupture. A 30-year survey, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23, pp. 774-777, (1964)
[4]  
Flamm B.L., Vaginal birth after cesarean section: controversies old and new, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28, pp. 735-744, (1985)
[5]  
Flamm B.L., Dunnett C., Fischermann E., Quilligan E.J., Vaginal delivery following cesarean section: use of oxytocin augmentation and epidural anesthesia with internal tocodynamic and internal fetal monitoring, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 148, pp. 759-763, (1984)
[6]  
Gibbs C.E., Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 23, pp. 507-515, (1980)
[7]  
Graham A.R., Trial labor following previous cesarean section, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 149, pp. 35-45, (1984)
[8]  
MacKenzie I.Z., Bradley S., Embrey M.P., Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivery by caesarean section, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 91, pp. 7-10, (1984)
[9]  
Martin J.N., Harris B.A., Huddleston J.F., Morrison J.C., Propst M.G., Wiser W.L., Perils H.W., Davidson J.T., Vaginal delivery following previous cesarean birth, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 146, pp. 255-263, (1983)
[10]  
Meehan F.P., Burke G., Kehoe J.T., Update on delivery following prior caesarean section. A 15 year review 1972–1987, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 30, pp. 205-212, (1989)