DETERMINING THE LIKELIHOOD OF MALIGNANCY IN SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES WITH BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS .1. THEORY

被引:215
作者
GURNEY, JW
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Omaha, NE 68198
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; LUNG; NODULE; LUNG NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421743
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Only two radiographic findings allow reliable distinction of benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules. Intuitively, it is clear that other radiographic and clinical findings should also be important in making this distinction. Subjectively incorporating these other findings into the decision of whether a nodule is benign or malignant is difficult. Likelihood ratios, which indicate the degree of malignancy or benignity represented by a test result or clinical finding, can be combined by means of the Bayes theorem to quantitate the probability of malignancy of a given nodule. From a literature survey, likelihood ratios were derived for six radiographic and four clinical characteristics associated with solitary pulmonary nodules. There were a total of 15 malignant and 19 benign findings, the most important of which were radiographic characteristics. For malignant nodules, the most important radiographic characteristics were thickness of the cavity wall, spicular edge, and diameter of over 3 cm. For benign nodules, the most important radiographic characteristics were benign growth rate and a benign pattern of calcification.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 413
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE P, 1987, STATISTICAL METHODS
[2]  
BATESON E M, 1965, Clin Radiol, V16, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0009-9260(65)80033-2
[3]   A CONVENIENT APPROXIMATION OF LIFE EXPECTANCY (THE DEALE) .1. VALIDATION OF THE METHOD [J].
BECK, JR ;
KASSIRER, JP ;
PAUKER, SG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 73 (06) :883-888
[4]   A CONVENIENT APPROXIMATION OF LIFE EXPECTANCY (THE DEALE) .2. USE IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
BECK, JR ;
PAUKER, SG ;
GOTTLIEB, JE ;
KLEIN, K ;
KASSIRER, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 73 (06) :889-897
[5]  
BECK JR, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P685
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGIC TESTS - CONTROL OF BIAS AND OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (02) :565-569
[7]   BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :411-423
[8]   HOW TO EVALUATE THE RADIOLOGY LITERATURE [J].
BLACK, WC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 154 (01) :17-22
[9]   COMMUNICATING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF RADIOLOGIC TEST-RESULTS - THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO [J].
BLACK, WC ;
ARMSTRONG, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (06) :1313-1318
[10]  
Buell P E, 1971, J Surg Oncol, V3, P539, DOI 10.1002/jso.2930030509