THE POWER OF A STATISTICAL TEST - WHAT DOES INSIGNIFICANCE MEAN

被引:62
作者
MARKEL, MD
机构
[1] Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-950X.1991.tb00336.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In statistical testing of data, the p value is a standard measure for reporting quantitative results. When a significant difference is reported, (e.g., P < .05), most readers understand that there is less than a 5% chance that the authors have made a type I error (false positive or alpha) with their conclusion. In contrast, when nonsignificant differences between treatments, groups, or parameters of interest are reported (e.g., P > .05), many investigators and readers incorrectly interpret the 95% confidence interval for this conclusion as a 95% chance of making the correct decision. In fact, the alpha level of significance (in this example, .05) is only one of the parameters that determines the probability of committing a type II error (false negative or beta) when concluding statistical insignificance. Statistical power is the probability of having made a correct decision when the statistical tests reveal insignificance (P > .05) and the null hypothesis is true. The higher the power, the greater the chance that the decision is correct. Power depends on the alpha level of significance, the sample size, the standard deviation of the population or the sample, and the magnitude of the difference the investigators are trying to demonstrate.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BAHN AK, 1972, BASIC MED STATISTICS, P86
[2]  
BEYER WH, 1968, CRC HDB TABLES PROBA, P284
[3]   CAPTOPRIL PROVIDES SUSTAINED HEMODYNAMIC BENEFITS IN DOGS WITH EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED MITRAL REGURGITATION [J].
BLACKFORD, LW ;
GOLDEN, AL ;
BRIGHT, JM ;
BRIGHT, RM ;
GOMPF, RE .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1990, 19 (03) :237-242
[4]   SUCCESS RATES OF UNILATERAL VS BILATERAL CATARACT-EXTRACTION IN DOGS [J].
DAVIDSON, MG ;
NASISSE, MP ;
RUSNAK, IM ;
CORBETT, WT ;
ENGLISH, RV .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1990, 19 (03) :232-236
[5]  
DIXON WJ, 1983, INTRO STATISTICAL AN, P78
[6]   IMPORTANCE OF BETA, TYPE-II ERROR AND SAMPLE-SIZE IN DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL - SURVEY OF 71 NEGATIVE TRIALS [J].
FREIMAN, JA ;
CHALMERS, TC ;
SMITH, H ;
KUEBLER, RR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (13) :690-694
[7]   ENTERIC FUNCTION IN CATS AFTER SUBTOTAL COLECTOMY FOR TREATMENT OF MEGACOLON [J].
GREGORY, CR ;
GUILFORD, WG ;
BERRY, CR ;
OLSEN, J ;
PEDERSON, NC .
VETERINARY SURGERY, 1990, 19 (03) :216-220
[8]  
HAYS WL, 1971, STATISTICS PROBABILI, P375
[9]  
INGELFINGER JA, 1987, BIOSTATISTICS CLIN M, P151
[10]  
LEIBER RL, 1990, J ORTHOPAED RES, V8, P304