ARCHITECTURE OF SELECTED MUSCLES OF THE ARM AND FOREARM - ANATOMY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR TENDON TRANSFER

被引:265
作者
LIEBER, RL
JACOBSON, MD
FAZELI, BM
ABRAMS, RA
BOTTE, MJ
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, University of California San Diego, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, CA
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 1992年 / 17A卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0363-5023(92)90444-T
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The architectural features of twenty-one different forearm muscles (n = 154 total muscles) were studied. Muscles included the extensor digitorum communis to the index, middle, ring, and small fingers, the extensor digit quinti, the extensor indicis proprius, the extensor pollicis longus, the flexor digitorum superficialis, the flexor digitorum profundus, the flexor pollicis longus, the pronator quadratus, the palmaris longus, the pronator teres, and the brachioradialis. Muscle length, mass, fiber pennation angle, fiber length, and sarcomere length were determined with the use of laser diffraction techniques. From these values, physiologic cross-sectional area and fiber length/muscle length ratio were calculated. The individual digital extensor muscles were found to be relatively similar in architectural structure. Similarly, the deep and superficial digital flexors were very similar architecturally, with the exception of the small finger flexor digitorum superficialis, which was much smaller and shorter than the rest of the digital flexors. The brachioradialis and the pronator teres had dramatically different architectural properties. While the masses of the two muscles were nearly identical, the muscles had significantly different predicted contractile properties based on their different fiber arrangement. The brachioradialis, with its long fibers arranged at a small pennation angle, had a physiologic cross-sectional area that was only one third that of the pronator teres, with its short fibers that were more highly pennated. Using these architectural data and the statistical method of discriminant analysis, we provide additional information that might be useful in the selection of potential donor muscles to restore thumb flexion, thumb extension, finger extension, and finger flexion.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 798
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Gans, Fiber architecture and muscle function, Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 10, pp. 160-207, (1982)
[2]  
Close, Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles, Physiol Rev, 52, pp. 129-197, (1972)
[3]  
Bodine, Roy, Eldred, Edgerton, Maximal force as a function of anatomical features of motor units in the cat tibialis anterior, J Neurophysiol, 6, pp. 1730-1745, (1987)
[4]  
Powell, Roy, Kanim, Bello, Edgerton, Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs, J Appl Physiol, 57, pp. 715-721, (1984)
[5]  
Roy, Bello, Powell, Simpson, Architectural design and fiber type distribution of the major elbow flexors and extensors of the monkey (Cynomolgus), J Morphol, 171, pp. 285-293, (1984)
[6]  
Sacks, Roy, Architecture of hindlimb muscles of cats: functional significance, J Morphol, 173, pp. 185-195, (1982)
[7]  
Wickiewicz, Roy, Powell, Edgerton, Muscle architecture of the human lower limb, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 179, pp. 317-325, (1983)
[8]  
Lieber, Blevins, Skeletal muscle architecture of the rabbit hindlimb: functional implications of muscle design, J Morphol, 199, pp. 93-101, (1989)
[9]  
Lieber, Fazeli, Botte, Architecture of selected wrist flexor and extensor muscles, J Hand Surg, 15 A, pp. 244-250, (1990)
[10]  
Lieber, Brown, Quantitative method for comparison of skeletal muscle architectural properties, J Biomech, 25, (1992)