PROBLEMS IN THE AVERAGE-RISK INTERPRETATION OF CATEGORICAL DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSES

被引:30
作者
GREENLAND, S
机构
[1] Departent of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001648-199509000-00020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 565
页数:3
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Greenland S., Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: Alternatives to categorical analysis, Epidemiology, 6, pp. 356-365, (1995)
[2]  
Weinberg C.R., How Bad Is Categorization? (Editorial), Epidemiology, 6, pp. 345-347, (1995)
[3]  
Richardson S., Stucker I., Hemon D., Comparison of relative risks in ecological and individual studies: Some methodological considerations, Int J Epidemiol, 16, pp. 111-120, (1987)
[4]  
Greenland S., Robins J.M., Ecologic studies: Biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples, Am J Epidemiol, 139, pp. 747-760, (1994)
[5]  
Heitjan D.F., Rubin D.B., Ignorability and coarse data, Ann Stat, 19, pp. 2244-2253, (1991)
[6]  
Hilden J., Misclassified determinants and effect attenuation, Am J Epidemiol
[7]  
Greenland S., Avoiding power loss associated with categorization and ordinal scores in dose-response and trend analysis, Epidemiology, 6, pp. 450-454, (1995)
[8]  
McCullagh P., Nelder J.A., Generalized Linear Models, (1989)
[9]  
Weinberg C.R., On pooling across strata when frequency matching has been followed in a cohort study, Biometrics, 41, pp. 117-127, (1985)
[10]  
Huber P.J., The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions, Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical and Statistical Probability, 1, (1967)