IMMUNOCHEMICAL VERSUS GUAIAC OCCULT BLOOD STOOL TESTS - RESULTS OF A COMMUNITY-BASED SCREENING-PROGRAM

被引:47
作者
PETRELLI, N
MICHALEK, AM
FREEDMAN, A
BARONI, M
MINK, I
RODRIGUEZBIGAS, M
机构
[1] Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, Elm and Carlton Streets
[2] Department of Education, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, Elm and Carlton Streets
[3] Department of Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, Elm and Carlton Streets
来源
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD | 1994年 / 3卷 / 01期
关键词
ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMMUNITY SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD TESTING; POLYPS;
D O I
10.1016/0960-7404(94)90021-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This study was designed to investigate two guaiac-based and one immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a community screening program. A total of 39,000 test kits consisting of Hemoccult II(R), Hemoccult Sensa(R) and HemeSelect(R) were distributed and of these 8933 (23%) were returned for testing. Follow-up contact with 1165 individuals who tested positive on at least one of the nine test slides was successful in 1076 cases (92.4%). Physician verification in 631 individuals revealed 25 patients (4%) diagnosed with colorectal cancer and 145 (23%) with polyps, of which 120 (82.7%) were adenomatous. The percentage of smaller adenomatous polyps detected relative to the percentage of large polyps (>1 cm) was: Hemoccult II(R) 31% versus 60%, Hemoccult Sensa(R) 73% versus 80% and HemeSelect(R) 34% versus 57%, respectively. The proportion of adenomatous polyps greater than 2 cm detected by individual tests was even more striking with Hemoccult II(R) positive for 83%, Hemoccult Sensa(R) for 100% and HemeSelect(R) for 75%. Of the 25 patients diagnosed with cancer, 17 (68%) were diagnosed with early-stage disease. A statistically significant trend (P<0.001) was observed with positive predictive values ranging from 3.3% for individuals with only one positive test to one approaching 40% for individuals with 7 or more positive tests. In this study, the most sensitive predictor of colorectal cancer was found to be the combination of Hemoccult II(R)/HemeSelect(R). While there was no increase in the positive predicted value for adenomatous polyps less-than-or-equal-to 1 cm, there was a direct linear increase for adenomatous polyps > 1 cm.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 36
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Boring, Squires, Tong, Cancer statistics, CA, 43, pp. 7-26, (1993)
  • [2] National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Control, Surveillance Program, Cancer statistics review 1973–1986, (1989)
  • [3] Warden, Petrelli, Herrera, Mittleman, The role of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal carcinoma, Dis Colon Rectum, 30, pp. 52-54, (1987)
  • [4] Warden, Petrelli, Herrera, Mittleman, Endoscopy versus double contrast barium enema in the evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal carcinoma, Am J Surg, 155, pp. 224-226, (1988)
  • [5] Wilking, Petrelli, Herrera, Walsh, Mittleman, A comparison of the 25 cm rigid proctosigmoidoscope with the 65 cm flexible endoscope in the screening of patients for colorectal carcinoma, Cancer, 57, pp. 669-671, (1986)
  • [6] Petrelli, Palmer, Michalek, Herrera, Mink, Bersani, Massive Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Archives of Surgery, 125, pp. 1049-1051, (1990)
  • [7] Cummings, Michalek, Mettlin, Mittleman, Screening for colorectal cancer using the Hemoccult II stool guaiac slide test, Cancer, 57, pp. 669-671, (1986)
  • [8] Cummings, Michalek, Tidings, Herrera, Mettlin, Results of a public screening program for colorectal cancer, NY State J Med, 86, pp. 68-72, (1986)
  • [9] Applegate, Spector, Colorectal cancer screening, J Community Health, 7, pp. 138-151, (1981)
  • [10] Ransohoff, Lang, Screening for colorectal cancer, N Engl J Med, 325, pp. 37-41, (1991)