HEPARIN AND PROTAMINE USE IN PERIPHERAL VASCULAR-SURGERY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN SURGEONS OF THE SOCIETY-FOR-VASCULAR-SURGERY AND THE EUROPEAN-SOCIETY-FOR-VASCULAR-SURGERY

被引:56
作者
WAKEFIELD, TW
LINDBLAD, B
STANLEY, TJ
NICHOL, BJ
STANLEY, JC
BERGQVIST, D
GREENFIELD, LJ
BERGENTZ, SE
机构
[1] Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
[2] Department of Surgery, Malmo General Hospital, Malmo
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY | 1994年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
HEPARIN; PROTAMINE SULFATE; ANTICOAGULATION REVERSAL; ADVERSE RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80459-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It was the intent of this study to document, in general, the patterns and complications of heparin and protamine usage during carotid endarterectomy, aortic and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstructions for occlusive disease, elective and emergent abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy, thromboembolectomy, and dialysis arteriovenous (AV) fistula placement by surgeons from North America and Europe. All vascular surgeons from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) were surveyed by a voluntary, self-reported questionnaire. Six hundred and forty-six completed questionnaires (284 from SVS and 362 from ESVS), representing a 62% response rate, were returned for evaluation. Systemic and regional administration of heparin was common during vascular procedures performed by both SVS and ESVS surgeons. Use of protamine to reverse heparin anticoagulation varied among SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, during: carotid endarterectomy (54% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), elective aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease (58% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), elective aortic reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm (63% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstruction (44% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Adverse reactions to protamine among the 25 219 and 12 902 cases reported from SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, included: hypotension (1209 and 495 cases), pulmonary artery hypertension (65 and eight cases), anaphylaxis (52 and 10 cases), and death (seven and two cases). These adverse responses accounted for 5.3% and 4.0% of the SVS and ESVS cases, respectively. Although this study is subject to the known limitations of a retrospective survey, it is clear that heparin use is common. Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is more common in North America. Severe reactions to protamine occur often enough to support the tenet that a safer compound is needed for heparin anticoagulation reversal. © 1994 W. B. Saunders Company Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 198
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Cavarocchi, Schaff, Orszulak, Homburger, Schnell, Pluth, Evidence for complement activation by protamine-heparin interaction after cardiopulmonary bypass, Surgery, 98, pp. 525-531, (1985)
[2]  
Fehr, Rohr, In vivo complement activation of polyanion-polycation complexes: evidence that C5a is generated intravascularly during heparin-protamine interaction, Clin Immunol Immunopath, 29, pp. 7-14, (1983)
[3]  
Kirklin, Cardiovascular effects of protamine sulfate in man, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 84, pp. 505-514, (1982)
[4]  
Kirklin, Chenoweth, Naftel, Blackstone, Kirklin, Bitrun, Cord, Reves, Samuelson, Effects of protamine administration after cardiopulmonary bypass on complement, blood elements and the hemodynamic state, Ann Thorac Surg, 41, pp. 193-199, (1986)
[5]  
Rent, Ertel, Eisenstein, Gewurz, Complement activation by interaction of polyanions and polycations. I. Heparinprotamine induced consumption of complement, J Immunol, 114, pp. 120-124, (1975)
[6]  
Siegel, Rent, Gewurz, Interactions of c-reactive protein with the complement system. I. Protamine-induced consumption of complement in acute phase sera, J Exp Med, 140, pp. 631-647, (1974)
[7]  
White, Complement activation during cardioipulmonary bypass, N Engl J Med, 305, (1981)
[8]  
Morel, Zapol, Thomas, Kitain, Robinson, Moss, Chenoweth, Lowenstein, C5a and thromboxane generation associated with pulmonary vaso- and broncho-constriction during protamine reversal of heparin, Anesthesiology, 66, pp. 597-604, (1987)
[9]  
Conzen, Habazettl, Gutmann, Hobbhahn, Goetz, Peter, Brendel, Thromboxane mediation of pulmonary hemodynamic responses after neutralization of heparin by protamine in pigs, Anesth Analg, 68, pp. 25-31, (1989)
[10]  
Degges, Foster, Dang, Read, Pulmonary hypertensive effect of heparin and protamine interaction: evidence for thromboxane B<sub>2</sub> release from the lung, Am J Surg, 154, pp. 696-699, (1987)