A SUBOSCINE BIRD (EASTERN PHOEBE, SAYORNIS-PHOEBE) DEVELOPS NORMAL SONG WITHOUT AUDITORY-FEEDBACK

被引:213
作者
KROODSMA, DE [1 ]
KONISHI, M [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH,DIV BIOL,PASADENA,CA 91125
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80047-8
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Imitative song development, its requisite auditory feedback, and the underlying neural control of learned song are becoming increasingly well known in songbirds, but the evolution of these characteristics from songbird ancestors is poorly understood. Suboscine flycatchers, which belong to the evolutionary sister group of the oscine songbirds (in the same order, Passeriformes), are thought not to imitate songs from other individuals. This study therefore examines the role of auditory feedback in song development and provides preliminary comments on neural control. Four eastern phoebes, Sayornis phoebe, were collected at 10-12 days of age and hand-reared in the laboratory; at approximately 35 days of age, before they began to sing, the birds were bilaterally deafened by removal of the cochlea. Songs of these phoebes, two males and two females, were judged to be normal when compared with songs of males recorded in nature and to songs of laboratory-reared, intact males and females. Like several non-passerines (representatives of Galliformes and Columbiformes), the eastern phoebe requires no auditory feedback for normal vocal development. Brain sections of phoebes contain no obvious cell clusters like the forebrain song nuclei of songbirds. If some of these nuclei mediate auditory feedback control of song development, the apparent absence of these nuclei in the phoebe is consistent with its ability to develop normal song without auditory feedback. © 1991 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 487
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, PROGR PSYCHOBIOLOGY
[2]   HORMONE CONCENTRATING CELLS IN VOCAL CONTROL AND OTHER AREAS OF BRAIN OF ZEBRA FINCH (POEPHILA-GUTTATA) [J].
ARNOLD, AP ;
NOTTEBOHM, F ;
PFAFF, DW .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1976, 165 (04) :487-511
[3]  
BAPTISTA LF, 1990, ETHOLOGY, V84, P15
[4]   FOREBRAIN LESIONS DISRUPT DEVELOPMENT BUT NOT MAINTENANCE OF SONG IN PASSERINE BIRDS [J].
BOTTJER, SW ;
MIESNER, EA ;
ARNOLD, AP .
SCIENCE, 1984, 224 (4651) :901-903
[5]   AXONAL CONNECTIONS OF A FOREBRAIN NUCLEUS INVOLVED WITH VOCAL LEARNING IN ZEBRA FINCHES [J].
BOTTJER, SW ;
HALSEMA, KA ;
BROWN, SA ;
MIESNER, EA .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1989, 279 (02) :312-326
[6]   EFFECTS OF DEAFENING ON THE CONTACT CALL OF THE BUDGERIGAR, MELOPSITTACUS-UNDULATUS [J].
DOOLING, RJ ;
GEPHART, BF ;
PRICE, PH ;
MCHALE, C ;
BRAUTH, SE .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1987, 35 :1264-1266
[7]  
FINK ROBERT P., 1967, BRAIN RES, V4, P369, DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90166-7
[8]  
FORTUNE E S, 1989, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V15, P617
[9]   DELINEATION OF A BRAIN NUCLEUS - COMPARISONS OF CYTOCHEMICAL, HODOLOGICAL, AND CYTOARCHITECTURAL VIEWS OF THE SONG CONTROL NUCLEUS HVC OF THE ADULT CANARY [J].
GAHR, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1990, 294 (01) :30-36
[10]   AN HYPOTHESIS CONCERNING THE RELATIONSHIP OF SYRINGEAL STRUCTURE TO VOCAL ABILITIES [J].
GAUNT, AS .
AUK, 1983, 100 (04) :853-862