Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and feed safety assessment

被引:401
作者
Antunovic, Boris [1 ]
Barlow, Susan [1 ]
Chesson, Andrew [1 ]
Flynn, Albert [1 ]
Hardy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeger, Michael-John [1 ]
Knaap, Ada [1 ]
Kuiper, Harry [1 ]
Larsen, John-Christian [1 ]
Lovell, David [1 ]
Noerrung, Birgit [1 ]
Pratt, Iona [1 ]
Rietjens, Ivonne [1 ]
Schlatter, Josef [1 ]
Silano, Vittorio [1 ]
Smulders, Frans [1 ]
Vannier, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
Genotoxicity; testing strategies;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2379
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 [食品科学与工程];
摘要
The Scientific Committee reviewed the current state-of-the-science on genotoxicity testing and provided a commentary and recommendations on genotoxicity testing strategies. A step-wise approach is recommended for the generation and evaluation of data on genotoxic potential, beginning with a basic battery of in vitro tests, comprising a bacterial reverse mutation assay and an in vitro micronucleus assay. Consideration should be given to whether specific features of the test substance might require substitution of one or more of the recommended in vitro tests by other in vitro or in vivo tests in the basic battery. In the event of negative in vitro results, it can be concluded that the substance has no genotoxic potential. In case of inconclusive, contradictory or equivocal results, it may be appropriate to conduct further testing in vitro. In case of positive in vitro results, review of the available relevant data on the test substance and, where necessary, an appropriate in vivo study to assess whether the genotoxic potential observed in vitro is expressed in vivo is recommended. Suitable in vivo tests are the mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test, transgenic rodent assay, and Comet assay. The approach to in vivo testing should be step-wise. If the first in vivo test is positive, no further testing is necessary and the substance should be considered as an in vivo genotoxin. If the test is negative, it may be possible to conclude that the substance is not an in vivo genotoxin. However, in some cases, a second in vivo test may be necessary (e.g. if the first test is negative but more than one endpoint in the in vitro tests are positive, an in vivo test on a second endpoint may be necessary). The combination of assessing different endpoints in different tissues in the same animal in vivo should also be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:69
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2011, GUID STRAT GEN TEST
[2]
Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain EFSA Scientific Committee [J].
Antunovic, Boris ;
Barlow, Susan ;
Chesson, Andrew ;
Flynn, Albert ;
Hardy, Anthony ;
Jany, Klaus-Dieter ;
Jeger, Michael-John ;
Knaap, Ada ;
Kuiper, Harry ;
Larsen, John-Christian ;
Lovell, David ;
Noerrung, Birgit ;
Schlatter, Josef ;
Silano, Vittorio ;
Smulders, Frans ;
Vannier, Philippe .
EFSA JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (05)
[3]
Hypothermia induces micronuclei in mouse bone marrow cells [J].
Asanami, S ;
Shimono, K .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 393 (1-2) :91-98
[4]
Transient hypothermia induces micronuclei in mice [J].
Asanami, S ;
Shimono, K ;
Kaneda, S .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 413 (01) :7-14
[5]
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURAL ALERTS TO POTENTIAL CARCINOGENICITY OR NONCARCINOGENICITY [J].
ASHBY, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1985, 7 (06) :919-921
[6]
ACTIVITY OF URETHANE AND N,N-DIMETHYLURETHANE IN THE MOUSE BONE-MARROW MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY - EQUIVALENCE OF ORAL AND INTRAPERITONEAL ROUTES OF EXPOSURE [J].
ASHBY, J ;
TINWELL, H ;
CALLANDER, RD .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1990, 245 (03) :227-230
[8]
Alternative strategies for carcinogenicity assessment: an efficient and simplified approach based on in vitro mutagenicity and cell transformation assays [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia .
MUTAGENESIS, 2011, 26 (03) :455-460
[9]
Structural analysis and predictive value of the rodent in vivo micronucleus assay results [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia ;
Worth, Andrew .
MUTAGENESIS, 2010, 25 (04) :335-341
[10]
Current issues in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis .65. The genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of paracetamol: A regulatory [J].
Bergman, K ;
Muller, L ;
Teigen, SW .
MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1996, 349 (02) :263-288