PRICK AND USE TESTS WITH 6 GLOVE BRANDS IN PATIENTS WITH IMMEDIATE ALLERGY TO RUBBER PROTEINS

被引：32

作者：

LAHTI, A ^{[1
]}

TURJANMAA, K ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV TAMPERE,DEPT DERMATOL,TAMPERE,FINLAND

来源：

CONTACT DERMATITIS | 1992年 / 26卷 / 04期

关键词：

CONTACT URTICARIA; PRICK TESTS; USE TESTS; RUBBER LATEX; RUBBER GLOVES; ELASTYREN(R); TACTYLON(TM); NON-LATEX GLOVES; THERMOPLASTIC ELASTOMERS; PREVENTION;

D O I：

10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00239.x

中图分类号：

R392 [医学免疫学];

学科分类号：

100102 ;

摘要：

20 patients with contact urticaria from rubber gloves were prick tested using eluates from 4 latex (Triflex(R), Ansell Gammex, Exona, Armi) and 2 non-latex (Tactylon(TM), Elastyren(R)) glove brands. All patients showed a positive prick test reaction to at least 2 latex glove eluates. A hypoallergenic glove (Ansell Gammex) gave a positive prick test reaction in 1 patient, but non-latex gloves were negative in all cases. All patients showed a positive result in the use test with a latex surgical glove (Triflex(R)), whereas none did with a non-latex glove (Tactylon(TM)). Non-latex gloves and, in some cases, also hypoallergenic latex gloves, are a good alternative to rubber gloves for patients with immediate latex allergy.

引用

页码：259 / 262

页数：4

共 7 条

[1]

FISHER AA, 1975, CUTIS, V15, P797

[2] THE SPECTRUM OF IGE-MEDIATED RESPONSES TO LATEX [J].