RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS AFTER COLONOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED ADENOMATOUS POLYPS

被引:829
作者
WINAWER, SJ
ZAUBER, AG
OBRIEN, MJ
HO, MN
GOTTLIEB, L
STERNBERG, SS
WAYE, JD
BOND, J
SCHAPIRO, M
STEWART, ET
PANISH, J
ACKROYD, F
KURTZ, RC
SHIKE, M
机构
[1] MEM SLOAN KETTERING CANC CTR,NATL POLYP STUDY HEADQUARTERS,NEW YORK,NY 10021
[2] MT SINAI HOSP,NEW YORK,NY
[3] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,MINNEAPOLIS,MN
[4] VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSP,VAN NUYS,CA
[5] CEDARS SINAI MED CTR,LOS ANGELES,CA 90048
[6] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,BOSTON,MA 02114
[7] BOSTON CITY HOSP,MALLORY INST PATHOL,BOSTON,MA 02118
[8] MILWAUKEE CTY MED CTR,MILWAUKEE,WI
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199304013281301
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The identification and removal of adenomatous polyps and post-polypectomy surveillance are considered to be important for the control of colorectal cancer. In current practice, the intervals between colonoscopies after polypectomy are variable, often a year long, and not based on data from randomized clinical trials. We sought to determine whether follow-up colonoscopy at three years would detect important colonic lesions as well as follow-up colonoscopy at both one and three years. Methods. Patients were eligible if they had one or more adenomas, no previous polypectomy, and a complete colonoscopy and if all their polyps had been removed. They were randomly assigned to have follow-up colonoscopy at one and three years or at three years only. The two study end points were the detection of any adenoma, and the detection of adenomas with advanced pathological features (defined as those >1 cm in diameter and those with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer). Results. Of 2632 eligible patients, 1418 were randomly assigned to the two follow-up groups, 699 to the two-examination group and 719 to the one-examination group. The percentage of patients with adenomas in the group examined at one and three years was 41.7 percent, as compared with 32.0 percent in the group examined at three years (P = 0.006). The percentage of patients with adenomas with advanced pathological features was the same in both groups (3.3 percent). Conclusions. Colonoscopy performed three years after colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps detects important colonic lesions as effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both one and three years. An interval of at least three years is recommended before follow-up examination after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Adoption of this recommendation nationally should reduce the cost of post-polypectomy surveillance and screening.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 906
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE, V2
[2]  
ARMITAGE P, 1987, STATISTICAL METHODS, P411
[3]   LONG-TERM RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER AFTER EXCISION OF RECTOSIGMOID ADENOMAS [J].
ATKIN, WS ;
MORSON, BC ;
CUZICK, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (10) :658-662
[4]  
AUBERT H, 1982, GASTROEN CLIN BIOL, V6, P183
[5]   RISK OF COLORECTAL-CANCER IN ADENOMA-BEARING INDIVIDUALS WITHIN A DEFINED POPULATION [J].
EIDE, TJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1986, 38 (02) :173-176
[6]  
FOWLER DL, 1980, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V26, P67
[7]   RISK OF RECURRENCE OF COLON POLYPS [J].
HENRY, LG ;
CONDON, RE ;
SCHULTE, WJ ;
APRAHAMIAN, C ;
DECOSSE, JJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1975, 182 (04) :511-515
[8]   PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF THE FREQUENCY AND SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF POLYPS MISSED BY COLONOSCOPY [J].
HIXSON, LJ ;
FENNERTY, MB ;
SAMPLINER, RE ;
MCGEE, D ;
GAREWAL, H .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (22) :1769-1772
[9]  
Hosmer DW, 1989, APPLIED LOGISTIC REG
[10]  
KIRSNER JB, 1960, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V39, P178