IMPROVED SURVIVAL AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME FOR INFANTS LESS THAN 801 GRAMS BIRTH-WEIGHT

被引:23
作者
KILBRIDE, HW
DAILY, DK
CLAFLIN, K
HALL, RT
MAULIK, D
GRUNDY, HO
机构
[1] and Department of Perinatology, St. Luke's Hospital, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-999471
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
We reviewed the perinatal management and subsequent outcome of infants 401 to 800 gm birthweight delivered in 1983 to 1985 compared with those born in 1980 to 1982. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring, cesarean section delivery, attempted delivery room resuscitation, and 5-minute Apgar scores greater than 5 were more frequent in 1983 to 1985. Significantly greater neonatal survival was evident for infants 500 to 700 gm birthweight (31%) and 24 to 27 weeks' gestation (45%) in 1983 to 1985, p < 0.005. Infant birthweight, gestational age, gender, and 5-minute Apgar score, in addition to intrapartum tocolysis use, were predictors of higher survival by stepwise discriminant analysis. At a mean follow-up of 27 months, 13% (6 of 46) born in 1983 to 1985 had major disability compared with 67% (6 of 9) of infants born in 1980 to 1982. There has been a significant increase in survival and improvement in neurodevelopmental follow-up status for infants less than 801 gm birthweight. These improved outcome data should be considered by caregivers providing perinatal management and counseling parents regarding extremely low birthweight infants. © 1990, by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 165
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Hack M., Fanaroff A.A., Changes in the delivery room care of the extremely small infant (<750g): Effects on morbidity and outcome, N Engl J Med, 314, pp. 660-664, (1986)
[2]  
Hirata T., Epcar J.T., Walsh A., Et al., Survival and outcome of infants 501 to 750 grams: A six year experience, J Pediatr, 102, pp. 741-748, (1983)
[3]  
Avery G.B., Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of the extremely low birthweight infant, Clin Perinatol, 14, pp. 361-365, (1987)
[4]  
Strong C., Aggressive treatment or conservative care? The tiniest newborns, Hastings Center Rep, 13, pp. 14-19, (1983)
[5]  
Goldenberg R.L., Nelson K.G., Dyer R.L., Et al., The variability of viability: The effect of physician's perceptions of viability on the survival of very low-birthweight infants, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 143, pp. 678-684, (1982)
[6]  
Neonatal Intensive Care for Low Birthweight Infants: Costs and Effectiveness, Health Technology Case Study, (1987)
[7]  
Ballard J.L., Novak K.K., Driver M., A simplified score for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants, J Pediatr, 95, pp. 769-774, (1979)
[8]  
Papile L.A., Burstein J., Burstein R., Et al., Incidence and evaluation of subependymal intraventricular hemorrhage: A study of infants with birthweights less than 1500 gm, J Pediatr, 92, pp. 529-534, (1978)
[9]  
Bayley N., Bayley Scales of Infant Development, (1969)
[10]  
Termen L.M., Merrill M.A., The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, (1973)