THE 10 QUESTIONS SCREEN FOR CHILDHOOD DISABILITIES - ITS USES AND LIMITATIONS IN PAKISTAN

被引:52
作者
DURKIN, MS
HASAN, ZM
HASAN, KZ
机构
[1] JINNAH POSTGRAD MED CTR,DEPT NEUROPSYCHIAT,KARACHI,PAKISTAN
[2] BAQAI MED COLL,KARACHI,PAKISTAN
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jech.49.4.431
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective-To assess the accuracy of the ten questions screen as a measure of childhood disability for epidemiologic studies in populations lacking resources for professional assessment of children's development and functioning. Design-Household survey and screening of children in phase one followed by clinical assessments in phase two. Setting-Karachi, Pakistan. Participants-A cluster sample of 6365 children, aged 2 to 9 years, screened using the ten questions and a subsample referred for clinical assessments. Main results-Although the sensitivity of the ten questions as a global screen for serious cognitive, motor, and seizure disabilities is high (84-100%), its sensitivity for identifying and distinguishing specific types of disability and for detecting vision, hearing, and mild disabilities, overall, is limited (generally <80% and as low as 4% for mild vision disability). The predictive value of a positive screening result is also limited-using the ten questions in surveys without clinical confirmation results in overestimation of the prevalence of serious disability by more than 300%. Conclusions-The ten questions screen is not an assessment tool. Its utility lies in its ability to screen or select a fraction of the population at high risk for serious disability. As a screening tool, it allows scarce diagnostic and other professional resources to be efficiently directed toward those at high risk.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 436
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   LIFE EXPECTANCY AND INFANT-MORTALITY IN LATIN-AMERICA [J].
BAHR, J ;
WEHRHAHN, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 36 (10) :1373-1382
[2]  
Belmont L., 1986, SCI TECHNOLOGY MENTA, P389
[3]  
Brown K H, 1991, Infect Dis Clin North Am, V5, P297
[4]  
BUSHAN V, 1993, PEDIATRICS, V91, P1094
[5]  
CHAMIE M, 1989, World Health Statistics Quarterly, V42, P122
[6]   VALIDITY OF THE 10 QUESTIONS SCREEN FOR CHILDHOOD DISABILITY - RESULTS FROM POPULATION-BASED STUDIES IN BANGLADESH, JAMAICA, AND PAKISTAN [J].
DURKIN, MS ;
DAVIDSON, LL ;
DESAI, P ;
HASAN, ZM ;
KHAN, N ;
SHROUT, PE ;
THORBURN, MJ ;
WANG, W ;
ZAMAN, SS .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :283-289
[7]   EVALUATING A 10 QUESTIONS SCREEN FOR CHILDHOOD DISABILITY - RELIABILITY AND INTERNAL STRUCTURE IN DIFFERENT CULTURES [J].
DURKIN, MS ;
WANG, W ;
SHROUT, PE ;
ZAMAN, SS ;
HASAN, ZM ;
DESAI, P ;
DAVIDSON, LL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (05) :657-666
[8]  
EWBANK DC, 1933, INT J EPIDEMIOL S1, V22, pS64
[9]  
Fleiss J.L., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, V2nd ed.
[10]  
Grossman H., 1983, CLASSIFICATION MENTA