LOW-FIELD VERSUS HIGH-FIELD MR-IMAGING OF THE KNEE - A COMPARISON OF SIGNAL BEHAVIOR AND DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE

被引:38
作者
PARIZEL, PM
DIJKSTRA, HAJ
GEENEN, GPJ
KINT, PAM
VERSTEYLEN, RJ
VANWIECHEN, PJ
DESCHEPPER, AM
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, Ignatius Ziekenhuis Breda (IZB), 4818 CK Breda
[2] Department of Radiology, University of Antwerp, Edegem
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR) IMAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COST EFFECTIVENESS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); LOW-FIELD STRENGTH IMAGING; KNEE; MR STUDIES;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(94)00589-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A prospective study was undertaken to compare MR imaging of the knee obtained with low-field and high-field systems. In 10 subjects, MR imaging of the knee was performed on a 0.2 T permanent magnet and on a 1.5 T superconductive system. Similar spin echo (SE) and 3D-FISP (3D Fourier transform with steady state precession) acquisitions were obtained. Comparative image analysis was performed independently by four radiologists. Results show that the image quality and diagnostic performance delivered by state-of-the-art 0.2 T and 1.5 T systems is equivalent. Advantages of the 1.5 T system included: better signal-to-noise ratio, shorter scan times, better visualization of asymptomatic grade 1 meniscal degeneration on SE images. Advantages of 0.2 T images were: decreased chemical shift, susceptibility and flow artifacts, improved evaluation of subchondral bone on 3D-FISP images, slightly better patient tolerance. We conclude that, for MR imaging of the knee, a low-field system is a cost-effective alternative to more expensive superconducting units.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 138
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Crues, Mink, Levy, Lotysch, Stoller, Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging, Radiology, 164, pp. 445-448, (1987)
[2]  
Stoller, Martin, Crues, Kaplan, Mink, Meniscal tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging, Radiology, 163, pp. 731-735, (1987)
[3]  
Quinn, Brown, Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging versus arthroscopy: how reliable a standard is arthroscopy?, Radiology, 181, pp. 843-847, (1991)
[4]  
Fischer, Fox, Del Pizzo, Friedman, Snyder, Ferkel, Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee, A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients, 73 A, pp. 2-10, (1991)
[5]  
Raunest, Oberle, Loehnert, Hoetzinger, The clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal disorders, J Bone Joint Surg, 73 A, pp. 11-16, (1991)
[6]  
Quinn, Brown, Szumowski, Menisci of the knee: radial MR imaging correlated with arthroscopy in 259 patients, Radiology, 185, pp. 577-580, (1992)
[7]  
Ruwe, Wright, Randall, Lynch, Jokl, McCarthy, Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy?, Radiology, 183, pp. 335-339, (1992)
[8]  
Edelman, Warach, Magnetic resonance imaging (second of two parts), N Engl J Med, 328, pp. 785-791, (1993)
[9]  
Mink, Levy, Crues, Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation, Radiology, 167, pp. 769-774, (1988)
[10]  
Grover, Bassett, Gross, Seeger, Finerman, Posterior cruciate ligament: MR imaging, Radiology, 174, pp. 527-530, (1990)