CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF PULMONARY NODULES WITH SINGLE-EXPOSURE DUAL-ENERGY SUBTRACTION CHEST RADIOGRAPHY WITH AN ITERATIVE NOISE-REDUCTION ALGORITHM

被引:45
作者
KIDO, S
IKEZOE, J
NAITO, H
ARISAWA, J
TAMURA, S
KOZUKA, T
ITO, W
SHIMURA, K
KATO, H
机构
[1] OSAKA UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,OSAKA 553,JAPAN
[2] OSAKA UNIV,SCH MED,BIOMED RES CTR,DIV FUNCT DIAGNOST IMAGING,OSAKA 553,JAPAN
[3] FUJI PHOTO FILM CO LTD,TECHNOL DEV CTR MIYANODAI,KANAGAWA,JAPAN
关键词
LUNG; NODULE; RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIGITAL; STORAGE PHOSPHOR; SUBTRACTION; DUAL-ENERGY;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824718
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical usefulness of the single-exposure dual-energy subtraction method with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen radiologists read three sets of images from 44 patients: original computed radiographic images only, original computed radiographic images plus conventional bone-subtracted images, and original computed radiographic images plus iterative noise-reduced bone-subtracted images. Twenty-two patients had one or more (maximum, five) pulmonary nodules; 22 had no pulmonary nodules. Observer performance was evaluated by means of calculation of the average area under the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic curves (Al). RESULTS: Compared with the original computed radiographic image only, detection of nodules was significantly better with both the original computed radiographic image plus iterative bone-subtracted image (A1 = 0.72 +/- 0.02 and 0.66 +/- 0.02, respectively; P = .01) and the original computed radiographic image plus conventional bone-subtracted image (Al = 0.66 +/- 0.02 and 0.61 +/- 0.01, respectively; P = .03). CONCLUSION: The iterative noise-reduction algorithm is superior to conventional methods in detection of pulmonary nodules.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 412
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
MISSED BRONCHOGENIC-CARCINOMA - RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN 27 PATIENTS WITH A POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE LESION EVIDENT IN RETROSPECT [J].
AUSTIN, JHM ;
ROMNEY, BM ;
GOLDSMITH, LS .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) :115-122
[2]
BUNCH PC, 1977, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V127, P124
[3]
MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS OF FREE-RESPONSE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (FROC) DATA [J].
CHAKRABORTY, DP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :561-568
[4]
MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL-DETECTION THEORY AND DETERMINATION OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS - RATING-METHOD DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :487-&
[5]
SCREENING FOR LUNG-CANCER [J].
EDDY, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (03) :232-237
[6]
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS, SIGNAL DETECTABILITY, AND METHOD OF FREE RESPONSE [J].
EGAN, JP ;
SCHULMAN, AI ;
GREENBERG, GZ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1961, 33 (08) :993-&
[7]
SINGLE-EXPOSURE DUAL-ENERGY COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY - IMPROVED DETECTION AND PROCESSING [J].
ERGUN, DL ;
MISTRETTA, CA ;
BROWN, DE ;
BYSTRIANYK, RT ;
SZE, WK ;
KELCZ, F ;
NAIDICH, DP .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (01) :243-249
[8]
FCHAKRABORTY DP, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1234, P517
[9]
CALCIFICATION IN PULMONARY NODULES - DETECTION WITH DUAL-ENERGY DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
FRASER, RG ;
HICKEY, NM ;
NIKLASON, LT ;
SABBAGH, EA ;
LUNA, RF ;
ALEXANDER, CB ;
ROBINSON, CA ;
KATZENSTEIN, ALA ;
BARNES, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (03) :595-601
[10]
DUAL-ENERGY DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHIC QUANTIFICATION OF CALCIUM IN SIMULATED PULMONARY NODULES [J].
HICKEY, NM ;
NIKLASON, LT ;
SABBAGH, E ;
FRASER, RG ;
BARNES, GT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :19-24