EFFECT OF AGE AND MATING STATUS ON THE MATING-BEHAVIOR AND PHEROMONE TITER IN ALFALFA BLOTCH LEAFMINER FEMALES AGROMYZA-FRONTELLA (DIPTERA, AGROMYZIDAE)

被引:11
作者
CARRIERE, Y [1 ]
MCNEIL, JN [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LAVAL, DEPT BIOL, QUEBEC CITY G1K 7P4, QUEBEC, CANADA
关键词
age; Agromyza frontella; alfalfa blotch leafminer; female sex pheromone; mating behaviour; mating status; receptivity;
D O I
10.1016/0022-1910(90)90095-W
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
The receptivity of 1- to 7-day-old virgin Agromyza frontella (Rondani) females did not change with age. In bioassays the cadavers of newly-emerged virgins (< 1 day old) elicited less courtship from males than those of older virgin females, but no differences were noted between cadavers of 1- to 6-day-old virgins. Females mated on the day of emergence and showed behavioural changes that reduced further encounters with males, although about 50% subsequently mated a second time. In bioassays, males in the presence of cadavers of mated females exhibited less mating behaviour than when presented cadavers of similar-aged virgins. The levels of 3,7-dimethylnonadecane, the female sex pheromone, increased with age in virgin females, but following mating the titre decreased and remained low for the remainder of the female's life. The apparent discrepancy between certain bioassay results and the observed pheromone titres are discussed within the context of available information on semiochemically-mating in Diptera. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 461
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   NEURO-HORMONAL CONTROL OF SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR IN INSECTS [J].
BARTH, RH ;
LESTER, LJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1973, 18 :445-472
[2]  
BLOMQUIST G.J., 1985, COMPREHENSIVE INSECT, V3, P117
[3]   POPULATION-STRUCTURE OF PIERID BUTTERFLIES .4. GENETIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INVESTMENT IN OFFSPRING BY MALE COLIAS [J].
BOGGS, CL ;
WATT, WB .
OECOLOGIA, 1981, 50 (03) :320-324
[4]   IDENTIFICATION OF FEMALE SEX-PHEROMONE IN ALFALFA BLOTCH LEAFMINER, AGROMYZA-FRONTELLA (RONDANI) (DIPTERA, AGROMYZIDAE) [J].
CARRIERE, Y ;
MILLAR, JG ;
MCNEIL, JN ;
MILLER, D ;
UNDERHILL, EW .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1988, 14 (03) :947-956
[5]  
CARRIERE Y, 1988, Journal of Insect Behavior, V1, P291, DOI 10.1007/BF01054527
[6]  
Conover W.J., 1999, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET, P428, DOI DOI 10.1002/BIMJ.19730150311
[7]  
FLETCHER BS, 1977, CHEM CONTROL INSECT, P129
[8]   THE CONTROL OF RECEPTIVITY AND OVULATION IN THE TSETSE-FLY, GLOSSINA-MORSITANS [J].
GILLOTT, C ;
LANGLEY, PA .
PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1981, 6 (03) :269-281
[9]  
GREENFIELD MD, 1982, INT J INVER REP DEV, V5, P323
[10]  
GROMKO MH, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P1273, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05649.x