DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF A POSITIVE FECAL OCCULT BLOOD-TEST FOUND ON DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION - DOES THE FINGER COUNT

被引:27
作者
EISNER, MS
LEWIS, JH
机构
[1] GEORGETOWN UNIV HOSP, DIV GASTROENTEROL, ROOM 2225, 3800 RESERVOIR RD NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20007 USA
[2] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, WASHINGTON, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.151.11.2180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The value of a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) found at the time of digital rectal examination is disputed. To determine the significance of a positive FOBT obtained in this manner, the records of 270 patients who underwent colonoscopy for any positive FOBT were retrospectively reviewed. Occult blood was found in 144 patients at the time of digital rectal examination and in 126 individuals after they submitted three spontaneously passed stool specimens. Of the patients with a positive FOBT on rectal examination, 77% were hospitalized at the time compared with only 17% of those with positive FOBTs from spontaneously passed stools. The frequency of colonic abnormalities was similar with both stool collection methods in inpatients and outpatients. No statistically significant differences in neoplastic polyp or colon cancer detection rates, nor in the finding of hemorrhoids or other anorectal abnormalities, were apparent. Therefore, the belief that a positive FOBT found at the time of digital examination can or should be discounted as a false positive (because of the presence of hemorrhoids or other lesions prone to trauma at the time of digital examination) was not substantiated by this study.
引用
收藏
页码:2180 / 2184
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] COLORECTAL-CANCER DETECTION IN THE PRACTICE SETTING - IMPACT OF FECAL BLOOD TESTING
    AHLQUIST, DA
    KLEE, GG
    MCGILL, DB
    ELLEFSON, RD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (05) : 1041 - 1045
  • [2] HEMOCCULT SCREENING IN DETECTING COLORECTAL NEOPLASM - SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP IN A LARGE GROUP-PRACTICE SETTING
    ALLISON, JE
    FELDMAN, R
    TEKAWA, IS
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 112 (05) : 328 - 333
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1989, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V261, P586
  • [4] SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER
    EDDY, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (05) : 373 - 384
  • [5] SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER IN A HIGH-RISK POPULATION - RESULTS OF A MATHEMATICAL-MODEL
    EDDY, DM
    NUGENT, FW
    EDDY, JF
    COLLER, J
    GILBERTSEN, V
    GOTTLIEB, LS
    RICE, R
    SHERLOCK, P
    WINAWER, S
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 92 (03) : 682 - 692
  • [6] DETECTION AND SURVEILLANCE OF COLORECTAL-CANCER
    FLEISCHER, DE
    GOLDBERG, SB
    BROWNING, TH
    COOPER, JN
    FRIEDMAN, E
    GOLDNER, FH
    KEEFFE, EB
    SMITH, LE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (04): : 580 - 585
  • [7] HOW TO PERFORM THE FECAL OCCULT BLOOD-TEST
    GNAUCK, R
    MACRAE, FA
    FLEISHER, M
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1984, 34 (03) : 134 - 147
  • [8] SUBSTANCES THAT INTERFERE WITH GUAIAC CARD TESTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GASTRIC ASPIRATE TESTING
    GOGEL, HK
    TANDBERG, D
    STRICKLAND, RG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1989, 7 (05) : 474 - 480
  • [9] DIAGNOSIS OF LARGE-BOWEL CANCER IN ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENT
    GREEGOR, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1967, 201 (12): : 943 - &
  • [10] HARDCASTLE JD, 1989, LANCET, V1, P1160