PROGRESS-BASED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULING

被引：7

作者：

PULTAR, M

机构：

[1] Middle East Tech. Univ., Ankara

来源：

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 1990年 / 116卷 / 04期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:4(670)

中图分类号：

TU [建筑科学];

学科分类号：

0813 ;

摘要：

A new construction scheduling technique, developed on the basis of progress charts and Gantt (bar) charts, is presented. The main aim of the development is to overcome the problem of fragmentation of activities during the application of the conventional critical path and precedence diagramming methods to construction projects. However, the level of detail available in these methods for the representation of precedence relationships has been preserved and extended. Timing relations are defined among any events in activities instead of the start and end only; these relations may be multiple and expressed in terms of progress level. The concepts of activity timing and scheduling and project timing are elaborated, starting from definitions of temporal constraints for single activities and proceeding through timing relations. The concepts of slacks, free slacks, and criticality are defined and discussed in detail. The process of project timing, project scheduling, updating, and slack computation are illustrated numerically on a small sample project. © ASCE.

引用

页码：670 / 688

页数：19

共 10 条

[1]

Birrell G.S., Construction planning-Beyond the critical path, J. Constr. Div, 106, 3, pp. 389-407, (1980)

[2]

Birrell G.S., A criticism of CPM for project planning, Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 113, 2, pp. 343-345, (1987)

[3]

Chrzanowski E.N., Johnston D.W., Application of linear scheduling, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 112, 4, pp. 476-491, (1986)

[4]

Fiedler K., Special conditions for time scheduling of building modernization projects, Project Management: Clarity for the 90’s (Proc. 8Th INTERNET Congress), pp. 461-468, (1985)

[5]

Hendrickson C., Martinelli D., Rehak D., Hierarchical rule-based activity duration estimation, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 113, 2, pp. 288-301, (1987)

[6]

Jaafari A., A criticism of CPM for project planning, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 110, 2, pp. 316-334, (1984)

[7]

Jennett E., Experience with and evaluation of critical path methods, Project Management: Techniques, Applications and Managerial Issues, pp. 156-186, (1983)

[8]

McGough E.H., Scheduling: Effective methods and techniques, J. Constr. Div, 108, 1, pp. 75-84, (1982)

[9]

Melin J.W., Whiteaker B., Fencing a bar chart, J. Constr. Div, 107, 3, pp. 497-507, (1981)

[10]

Wiest J.D., Precedence diagramming method: Some unusual characteristics and their implications for project managers, J. Oper. Mgmt, 1, 3, pp. 213-222, (1981)

← 1 →