CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN TRANSITION - DEVELOPMENT OF PREFERENCE IN A FREE-OPERANT PROCEDURE

被引:28
作者
MAZUR, JE
RATTI, TA
机构
[1] Psychology Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, 06515, CT
来源
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR | 1991年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03197882
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Twenty acquisition curves were obtained from each of 8 pigeons in a free-operant choice procedure. Every condition began with a phase in which two response keys had equal probabilities of reinforcement, and, as a result, subjects' responses were divided fairly evenly between the two keys. This was followed by a phase in which one key had a higher probability of reinforcement than the other, and the development of preference was observed. In all but a few cases, response proportions increased for the key with the higher probability of reinforcement. In most conditions, the two probabilities differed by .06, but the actual probabilities varied (from .16 and .10 in one condition to .07 and .01 in another). Development of preference for the key with the higher probability of reinforcement was slower when the ratio of the two reinforcement probabilities was small (.16/.10) than when it was large (.07/.01). This finding is inconsistent with the predictions of several different quantitative models of acquisition, including the kinetic model (Myerson & Miezin, 1980) and the ratio-invariance model (Horner & Staddon, 1987). However, the finding is consistent with a hypothesis based on Weber's law, which states that the two alternatives are more discriminable when the ratio of their reinforcement probabilities is larger, and, as a result, the acquisition of preference is faster.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN TRANSITION - DEVELOPMENT OF PREFERENCE FOR THE HIGHER PROBABILITY OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
BAILEY, JT ;
MAZUR, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1990, 53 (03) :409-422
[2]  
BUSH RR, 1955, STOCHASTIC MODELS LE
[3]   CONCURRENT PERFORMANCES - INHIBITION OF ONE RESPONSE BY REINFORCEMENT OF ANOTHER [J].
CATANIA, AC .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1969, 12 (05) :731-+
[4]   A MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF CHOICE ON CONCURRENT-CHAINS SCHEDULES [J].
FANTINO, E ;
ROYALTY, P .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1987, 48 (01) :145-159
[5]   LEARNING THE EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY [J].
HARLEY, CB .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1981, 89 (04) :611-633
[6]  
HERRNSTEIN RJ, 1980, LIMITS ACTION ALLOCA, P143, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-662650-6.50011-8
[7]   PROBABILISTIC CHOICE - A SIMPLE INVARIANCE [J].
HORNER, JM ;
STADDON, JER .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1987, 15 (01) :59-92
[8]  
Kacelnik A., 1987, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior, V6, P63
[10]   THE FEED-FEED DECISION - HOW GOLDFISH SOLVE THE PATCH DEPLETION PROBLEM [J].
LESTER, NP .
BEHAVIOUR, 1984, 89 :175-199