CHRONIC CRITICAL LEG ISCHEMIA MUST BE REDEFINED

被引:70
作者
THOMPSON, MM
SAYERS, RD
VARTY, K
REID, A
LONDON, NJM
BELL, PRF
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, LE2 7LX, Clinical Sciences Building
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY | 1993年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
EUROPEAN CONSENSUS DOCUMENT; CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA; LIFE-TABLES; LIMB SALVAGE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80260-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Second European Consensus Document on Chronic Critical Leg Ischaemia defines critical limb ischaemia in non-diabetic patients as rest pain or tissue necrosis (ulceration or gangrene) with an ankle systolic pressure (ASP) of less than or equal to 50 mmHg, or a toe pressure of less than or equal to 30 mmHg. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this definition is able to predict the outcome of patients with severe lower limb ischaemia and thus to determine the relevance of the definition in clinical practice. We have analysed 148 severely ischaemic limbs in 133 non-diabetic patients who presented with rest pain, tissue necrosis or a combination of these symptoms. Fifty-one percent of these limbs fulfilled the current definition with an ASP ≤50 mmHg; 49% had an ASP >50 mmHg and were thus not defined as critically ischaemic according to the current definition. We have compared actuarial limb salvage and mortality rates in patients with an ASP ≤50 mmHg to those patients with an ASP >50mmHg. The 1 year limb salvage and mortality rates for ischaemic limbs fulfilling the European Consensus Document criteria were 78.7 and 36.7% respectively, compared to rates of 73.9 and 17.3% in patients who were not defined as critically ischaemic under the current definition. There were no significant differences between 1 year limb salvage or mortality rates between the two patients groups (p = 0.843, 0.078, respectively). These results suggest that the current definition of chronic critical limb ischaemia based on an arbitrary ankle systolic pressure of ≤50mmHg has little clinical relevance and needs to be revised. © 1993 Grune & Stratton Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 426
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Second European Consensus Document on Chronic Critical Limb Ischaemia, Eur J Vase Surg, 6, pp. 1-32, (1992)
[2]  
Bell, Charlesworth, Depalma, Et al., The definition of critical ischaemia of a limb. Working Party of the International Vascular Symposium, Br J Surg, 69, (1982)
[3]  
Rutherford, Flanigan, Gupta, Et al., Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards SVS/ISCVS. Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischaemia, J Vasc Surg, 4, pp. 80-94, (1986)
[4]  
Rutherford, Standards for evaluating results of interventional therapy for peripheral vascular disease, Circulation, 83, (1991)
[5]  
European Consensus on Critical Limb Ischaemia, Lancet, 1, pp. 737-738, (1989)
[6]  
Fagrell, Critical limb ischaemia: comments on a consensus document, J Intern Med, 231, pp. 195-198, (1992)
[7]  
Raines, Darling, Ruth, Vascular laboratory criteria for the management of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities, Surgery, 79, pp. 21-28, (1976)
[8]  
Carter, Lezack, Digital systolic pressures in the lower limb in arterial disease, Circulation, 43, pp. 905-914, (1971)
[9]  
Kaplan, Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53, pp. 457-481, (1958)
[10]  
Mantel, Haenszel, Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease., J Natl Cancer Inst, 22, pp. 719-748, (1959)