SPUTNIK AND THE PRINCETON 3 - THE NATIONAL-SECURITY LABORATORY THAT WAS NOT TO BE

被引:7
作者
AASERUD, F
机构
[1] Niels Bohr Archive, DK-2100 Copenhagen
来源
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 1995年 / 25卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.2307/27757744
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 239
页数:55
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Reingold N., The case of the disappearing laboratory, American quarterly, 29, pp. 77-101, (1977)
[2]  
Reingold, Science, American style, pp. 224-246, (1991)
[3]  
Kevles D.J., ‘Into hostile political camps:’ The reorganization of international science in World War I, Isis, 62, pp. 47-60, (1970)
[4]  
Stewart I., Organizing scientific research for war: The administrative history of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, (1948)
[5]  
Galison P., Hevly B., Big science: The growth of large-scale research, (1992)
[6]  
Kevles D.J., Scientists, the military, and the control of postwar defense research: The case of the Research Board for National Security, 1944-46, Technology and culture, 16, pp. 20-47, (1975)
[7]  
Forman P., Ron J.M.S., National military establishments and the advancement of science and technology: Studies in twentieth century history
[8]  
Seidel R.W., A home for big science: The Atomic Energy Commission’s laboratory system, HSPS, 16, 2, pp. 135-175, (1986)
[9]  
Smith B.L.R., The Rand Corporation: Case study of a nonprofit advisory corporation, (1966)
[10]  
Marvin J.R., Weyl F.J., The summer study, Naval research reviews, (1966)