COMPARISON OF THE ABILITY OF 2 SPERM PREPARATION TECHNIQUES TO REMOVE MICROBES

被引:12
作者
KARLSTROM, PO
HJELM, E
LUNDKVIST, O
机构
[1] Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital
[2] Microbiology, University Hospital
关键词
HYALURONIC ACID; MICROBES; SPERM PREPARATION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137346
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The ability of a new sperm preparation method-self migration in sodium hyaluronate (SH)-to remove microbes from samples was compared to that of the traditional method of centrifugation/swim up (CS). Two 1-ml aliquots were taken from 20 semen samples used for inseminations, and prepared by each of the methods. Samples for culture were taken immediately before wash and at 2 and 24 h after. Microbes were found in all raw semen samples with a mean concentration of 47.8 x 10(3) colony forming units per ml (c.f.u./ml). After preparation and 2 h incubation with and without penicillin, both CS and SH were found greatly to reduce the number of isolates. There were no differences between the ability of the two methods to reduce microbe concentration, although SH recovered more progressive motile spermatozoa than CS (P < 0.05). When penicillin preparation was omitted, both the CS and SH methods resulted in significantly more isolates after 24 h of incubation. This effect of penicillin preparation was also evident after only 2 h of incubation with CS, but not with SH. No clinical signs of infection were observed among women receiving treatment. We conclude that sperm preparation by self migration in sodium hyaluronate is a simple and safe method to remove microbes and to recover motile spermatozoa.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 389
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Drevius L.O., The sperm-rise test, J, Reprod, Fertil, 24, (1971)
[2]  
Hjelm E., Forsum U., Hall6n A., Pehlsson C., Wallin U., Primary isolation of curved rods from women with vaginal discharge, Scand, J, Nephrol, Urol, Suppi, 86, pp. 153-155, (1984)
[3]  
Jones R.C., Holt W.W., The effect of washing on the ultrastructure and cytochemistry of ram spermatozoa, J, Reprod, Fertil., 41, (1974)
[4]  
Leiva J.L., Peterson E.M., Wetkowski M.E., Maza L.M., Stone S.C., Microorganisms in semen used for artificial insemination, Obstet, Gynecol, 65, (1985)
[5]  
McDowell J.S., Veeck L.L., Jones H.W., Analysis of human spermatozoa before and after processing for in vitro fertilization, J, Vitro Fertil, Embryo Transfer, 3, (1985)
[6]  
Naessens A., Foulon W., Debrucker P., Devroey P., Lauwers S., Recovery of microorganism in semen and the relationship of semen evaluation, Fertil, Sterii, 45, (1986)
[7]  
Ripa K.T., M4rdh P.-A., Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide treated McCoy cells, J, Clin, Microbiol, 6, pp. 328-331, (1977)
[8]  
Shepard M.C., Lunceford C.D., Urease color test medium U-9 for the detection of T’ mycoplasmas in clinical material, Appi Microbiol, 70, (1970)
[9]  
Sun L.-S., Gastaldi C., Peterson E.M., De La Maza L.M., Stone S.C., Comparison of techniques for the selection of bacteria-free sperm preparations, Fertii Sterii, 48, (1987)
[10]  
Swensson C.E., Toth A., Toth C., Wolfgruber L., Asymptomatic bacteriospermia in infertile men, Andrologia, 12, (1980)