CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .3. ABDOMINAL MEASUREMENTS

被引:233
作者
CHITTY, LS
ALTMAN, DG
HENDERSON, A
CAMPBELL, S
机构
[1] INST CHILD HLTH,DEPT CLIN GENET,LONDON,ENGLAND
[2] IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,LONDON,ENGLAND
[3] KINGS COLL HOSP,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,LONDON,ENGLAND
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1994年 / 101卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13077.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To construct new size charts for fetal abdominal circumference and area. Design A prospective, cross sectional study. Setting The routine ultrasound department of a London teaching hospital. Subjects The fetuses of 663 women seen in the routine antenatal booking clinic whose ultrasound and menstrual dates agreed within 10 days. Methods Fetuses were scanned once only for the purpose of the study at gestations between 12 and 42 weeks, when up to 20 dimensions were measured. Separate regression models were fitted to estimate the mean and standard deviation as functions of gestational age. Centiles were derived by combining these two regression models, assuming that the measurements have a Normal distribution at each gestation. Results A total of 610 fetuses had their abdominal circumference measured directly. Abdominal diameters were recorded for 425 fetuses and the circumference was also derived from these, as was the abdominal area. New charts for abdominal circumference (directly measured and derived from diameters) are presented. The directly measured circumferences were consistently (by about 3.5%) greater than those derived from measurement of the abdominal diameters. The new charts are compared with previously published charts that are in wide use. A chart for abdominal area is also presented. Conclusions We have constructed new size charts for the fetal abdominal circumference, both measured directly and derived from abdominal diameters. We have demonstrated the difference between the size charts constructed from these two sets of values and hence the importance of using the appropriately derived chart when assessing the abdominal circumference. The differences between the new charts and previous ones may be largely due to methodological differences.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .1. METHODOLOGY
    ALTMAN, DG
    CHITTY, LS
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [2] ALTMAN DG, 1994, UNPUB ESTIMATION FET
  • [3] ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENT OF FETAL HEAD TO ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE RATIO IN ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH RETARDATION
    CAMPBELL, S
    THOMS, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1977, 84 (03): : 165 - 174
  • [4] ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT
    CAMPBELL, S
    WILKIN, D
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09): : 689 - 697
  • [5] FETAL HEAD AND ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCES .2. A CRITICAL RE-EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP TO MENSTRUAL AGE
    DETER, RL
    HARRIST, RB
    HADLOCK, FP
    CARPENTER, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1982, 10 (08) : 365 - 372
  • [6] Deter RL, 1986, QUANTITATIVE OBSTETR
  • [7] ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT WITH THE USE OF HEAD, BODY, AND FEMUR MEASUREMENTS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    HADLOCK, FP
    HARRIST, RB
    SHARMAN, RS
    DETER, RL
    PARK, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (03) : 333 - 337
  • [8] FETAL ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE AS A PREDICTOR OF MENSTRUAL AGE
    HADLOCK, FP
    DETER, RL
    HARRIST, RB
    PARK, SK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 139 (02) : 367 - 370
  • [9] JEANTY P, 1984, AM J PERINAT, V1, P127
  • [10] KURTZ AB, 1988, OBSTETRICAL MEASUREM, P64