EVALUATION OF THE AMES SERALYZER FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CARBAMAZEPINE, PHENOBARBITAL, AND PHENYTOIN CONCENTRATIONS IN SALIVA

被引:30
作者
MILES, MV
TENNISON, MB
GREENWOOD, RS
BENOIT, SE
THORN, MD
MESSENHEIMER, JA
EHLE, AL
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROL,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514
[2] UNIV N CAROLINA,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514
[3] BURROUGHS WELLCOME CO,RES TRIANGLE PK,NC 27709
关键词
Apoenzyme reactivation immunoassay; Carbamazepine; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Saliva;
D O I
10.1097/00007691-199009000-00016
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The performance of the dry-phase apoenzyme reactivation immunoassay system (ARIS) for the measurement of carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), and phenytoin (PHT) concentrations in saliva was compared with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). Blood and saliva samples were collected from 163 adult and pediatric epilepsy patients, then analyzed using both methods. Regressions between ARIS saliva CBZ, PB, and PHT concentrations, and FPIA unbound and total serum concentrations were highly correlated, but the ARIS technique was somewhat less precise than the FPIA. Valproic acid co-medication did not affect the relationships between ARIS and FPIA saliva concentrations and unbound serum concentrations of PHT, but did disrupt the relationship between ARIS and FPIA saliva PHT and total serum PHT. The sensitivity, specificity, predicted value positive (PV+) of a therapeutic concentration, and predicted value negative (PV-) of a concentration outside the therapeutic range for the ARIS saliva technique compared very well with FPIA for CBZ, PB, and PHT. The ARIS technique for CBZ, PB, and PHT saliva determination provides acceptable accuracy, precision, and sensitivity for therapeutic monitoring. In practice, the benefits of the ARIS saliva technique, including ease of collection, safety, patient/parent acceptance, and short analysis time, are striking. © 1990 Raven Press, Ltd., New York.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 510
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] ANAVEKAR SN, 1978, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V24, P629
  • [2] MONITORING PHENYTOIN IN SALIVARY AND PLASMA ULTRAFILTRATES OF PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS
    BACHMANN, K
    FORNEY, RB
    VOELLER, K
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1983, 5 (03) : 325 - 329
  • [3] USE OF SALIVA IN MONITORING CARBAMAZEPINE MEDICATION IN EPILEPTIC CHILDREN
    BARTELS, H
    OLDIGS, HD
    GUNTHER, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1977, 126 (1-2) : 37 - 44
  • [4] BRETTFELD C, 1989, THER DRUG MONIT, V11, P612
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF PLASMA AND SALIVA LEVELS OF CARBAMAZEPINE AND PHENYTOIN AS MONOTHERAPY
    CALLAGHAN, N
    GOGGIN, T
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1984, 153 (05) : 170 - 173
  • [6] COOK CE, 1975, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V18, P742
  • [7] QUANTITATIVE-DETERMINATION OF PHENOBARBITAL AND PHENYTOIN BY DRY-PHASE APOENZYME REACTIVATION IMMUNOASSAY SYSTEM (ARIS)
    CROCI, D
    NESPOLO, A
    TARENGHI, G
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1987, 9 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [8] FALLACIOUS RESULTS FROM MEASURING SALIVARY CARBAMAZEPINE CONCENTRATIONS
    DICKINSON, RG
    HOOPER, WD
    KING, AR
    EADIE, MJ
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1985, 7 (01) : 41 - 45
  • [9] Draper N, 1981, APPL REGRESSION ANAL, P305
  • [10] SALIVA PHENOBARBITAL AND PHENYTOIN CONCENTRATIONS IN EPILEPTIC ADOLESCENTS
    FRIEDMAN, IM
    LITT, IF
    HENSON, R
    HOLTZMAN, D
    HALVERSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1981, 98 (04) : 645 - 647